By Eric Striker – Originally Published at National Justice on September 17th, 2019

Editor’s Note: This is the second article on our website that deals with Japan’s relationship with international Zionism. The first article was a primer that dealt mostly with history, and less with contemporary issues, aside from the recent massive gold heist committed by “Israelis” residing in Japan as well as the false flag attack on a Japanese tanker ship meant to frame Iran at the literal exact time that Abe was meeting with Imam Khamenei.

This article deals mostly with contemporary issues in how global Zionism – particularly with its push for countries to take on liberal immigration policies to facilitate mass migration so that native peoples become minorities in their own countries, which weakens the unity of nations which ends up protecting “Israel” from any potential nation which will gain strength to stand up to its various schemes (i.e. IMF banking, Zionist wars, pornography, LGBTQP, etc.) – is affecting Japan vis-a-vis the policies of Shinzo Abe.

However, we should not be pessimistic when it comes to Abe. Post-war Japan was forced to be under the thumb of the West. Of course, some politicians who are under the spell of mental slavery welcome American subversion of their national sovereignty and independence, but many Japanese politicians are nationalists who have little wiggle room to restore their independence. The Japanese Constitution is a big ball-and-chain that prevents many positive political positions from being taken. Japanese nationalist politicians are stuck between rocks and hard places. Shinzo Abe, a former historical revisionist, is one of those politicians. However, this article shows how in some ways he has strayed from his roots.

The purpose of re-publishing this article is in hopes that some of his nationalist inner circle (such as the JINF, a historical revisionist think tank) sees the folly of many of his policies, from liberalizing immigration to neoliberal economics, and convince him otherwise. This is not an attack on Abe-san, but rather a respectful criticism in hopes that he will add to the many positive positions he has taken as Prime Minister by reversing the policies of economic neoliberalism and reducing migration levels to healthy amounts, while supporting economic and cultural incentives towards marriage and childbearing among the Japanese people.

Before the SJWs reading this freak out, being against mass migration is not “racist” nor is it necessarily anti-immigrant. It is fine to have reasonable, limited immigration quotas, where the native peoples and citizens get the most amount of public benefits and constitute the majority of the population. As the video linked above of Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre states, the policy of mass migration is meant to protect the Zionist regime. Through various wars against the global South, unleashing of terrorist proxies across West Asia, and carnivorous IMF loans that bring nations to economic destitution, millions of people are forced to flee their homes. While we should sympathize with their plight as a result of Zio-imperialism, that doesn’t mean we should look at mass migration – a policy endorsed by the same Zionists who destroyed those very countries and created the refugee crises in the first place – as a good thing. The goal is to create a Clash of Civilizations where Christian Westerners are pitted against Muslim Easterners, and both groups are instigated by Zionist infiltrators (Kosherservatives like Breitbart on the right and Trotskyite social democrats like the Southern Poverty Law Center on the left) until the tension reaches fever pitch and (God forbid) a large scale civil war breaks out across Europe and/or America, or at the very least, the lack of unity and trust among people prevents any real opposition to global Zionism from people across religious and political divides.

There is also a bit of hypocrisy of many of these liberals to claim to support indigenous peoples of the world, while at the same time supporting mass migration policies, which ends up further displacing indigenous peoples, further impeding on their land rights as well as employment opportunities. Of course, the main instigator of economic problems is the global institutionalization of usury, via the Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, and fractional reserve banking, which causes artificial scarcity, since God made enough for every person’s need, though not everyone’s greed. Mass immigration only plays a supplementary role in contributing to economic woes within the framework of global usury’s artificial scarcity. Zionist-backed fake “conservatives” who solely focus on immigrants as the problem, while not focusing on the bankers as the head of the snake, are only serving the Zionist Clash of Civilizations agenda.

The same can be said about Japan when it comes to being consistent in supporting the right of native peoples to exist on their own land. If the current rate of immigration continues to outweigh the low birthrate, Japan will cease to be Japanese. The land of the Yamato people will be the land of immigrants who care not for the culture of the land and only care about moving up the corporate ladder in whatever company they land a job with, since the dissolution of a native peoples in a society certainly leads to hyper-individualism, whereas people with a common ethnic-religious background have more of a sense of brotherhood. Of course, nationalism does not have to equal supremacism. In the Holy Qur’an, Allah says that He created us into nations and tribes so that we can get to know each other. In that there is a mizan, or balance in Arabic. There are ethnic distinctions between people, but it shouldn’t be a negative connotation or a means for conflict or false senses of superiority (like supremacists have, be they followers of Judaism – a religion based on supremacy – or whites who have been subjected to racist mind programming). Even that, the primary driver of man’s ideology and life goals should not be ethnos, but ethos/logos. Dr. E. Michael Jones tells of his attempts to convince Dr. David Duke of this concept in his book Why Ethnos Need Logos.

The problem of Japan’s birthrate cannot purely be solved by ethno-nationalism. Indeed, many nationalist Japanese who hold anti-American sentiments believe in taking revenge on America for the war on Japan by developing Japan’s economy in spite of its lack of natural resources, which it has done. But this economic development has come at a cost to Japan’s social life. This is the problem with materialistic ideologies. Getting so focused on this dunya, or worldly life in Arabic, has widely affected the desire of the average Japanese person to settle down and create a family, not only a far more worthwhile endeavor when it comes to the wealth of the heart (as opposed to the wealth of the pocketbook, even though Allah SWT provides sustenance for every human being in this world, no matter how small) but as an institution that is literally the foundation of society. This is not a call for Japanese to convert to Islam, unless they discover it to be the objective truth on their own, but rather for them to return to their own traditionalist spiritual roots of Shintoism and Buddhism that will certainly cause them to prioritize the creation of the family unit much more than the status quo of hyper-materialism where your job is your God, your wife, and your children all at the same time. That is why pure ethno-nationalism alone can never solve the issues of gaining national independence and sovereignty for any peoples, because without a spiritual system of morality (rather than a materialistic system), ethno-nationalism can easily turn into ethno-supremacism, which is exactly why the Jewish state of “Israel” is so malevolent: they don’t care that they built their supremacist state on the blood of hundreds of thousands of people, as well as the millions of people killed by the Western wars on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria that they were the primary pushers of. Only a tiny, tiny fraction of Jews can legitimately claim ancestral ties to Palestine, and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s call for a referendum for Palestinians of all faiths to vote on the future of their country will include this extremely small minority of Jews who can actually prove to be Palestinian. The majority of Jews have no ties even to the Children of Israel; the majority of them are converts from Khazaria. But even actual Middle Eastern Jews, like Mizrahis from Yemen or North Africa, certainly have no right to Palestine. Add to that that Jewish ideology is supremacist at its core, so Jewish nationalism will always be supremacist and thus is dangerous to the rest of humanity.

Japanese need to return to their traditional ethos in order to save their ethnos from potential extinction. In the period before and during WW2, Japan had a resurgence of traditional values after a period of liberalism. In the same way, Japan can have a similar resurgence if they wake up.

In this article, the story of how international Jewry helped to get support for the Japanese military to fight against Tsarist Russia as proxy retribution for the Tsar’s crackdown on Jewish money lending practices and alleged “atrocities” of the [highly exaggerated] pogroms demonstrates how in the very early 1900s, Japan’s political establishment were liberal democrats. But with a little behind-the-scenes work by ideological figures in Japanese society, they were able to quickly turn into a conservative nationalist government with pan-Asianist aspirations to help their fellow Asian brothers and sisters throw off Western imperialism and Soviet Bolshevism. It is worth noting that international Jewry also got military support for the Chinese against the Japanese once Japan left its liberalism.

Similarly, we hope that it is articles like these that serve as an underground push towards another an ideological shift – similar to the one that happened in the 1930s – among Japan’s most influential people, because aside from the historical antagonism of international Zionists against Japan (as noted in our first article on this subject), the current antagonism of Japan can result in fatal consequences at worst – such as the possibility for the Mossad to carry out a deadly false flag attack on Japanese soil and blame it on Iran, Hamas, or Hezbollah – or at best, cause Japan to embrace the destructive policies of liberal immigration laws and neoliberal economic policies which will make the Yamato people a minority on their own land. The Japanese people and the Japanese political class must both realize that “Israel” is not their friend. Of course, the government of Japan cannot dream of countering “Israel” in a direct manner like Iran or Syria does. However, they can pursue intelligent diplomatic means of dealing subtle blows to “Israel’s” plans for the region, such as how Japan denied the “official” reports that Iran was behind the false flag oil tanker attack.

It is understandable that Japan may be pushed towards sympathy towards “Israel,” not just due to American pressure, but also due to the Japanese government’s ongoing quarrels with the Japanese Red Army. The Japanese government and intelligence services should know that the JRA’s opposition to the Japanese state and Japanese nationalism comes from their Marxist views, not their anti-Israel views, and the earliest supporters of the Zionist entity’s genocide of Palestine were leftists and Marxists, not conservative nationalists. Additionally, the book Emancipation by Jewish author Michael Goldfarb details Karl Marx’s friendship with Jewish ideologue and proto-Zionist Moses Hess, and how despite their differences, they had influence on each other’s ideas. Hess is the author of Rome & Jerusalem, a major work in pre-“Israel” Zionist intellectual discourse. Therefore, the enemy of Japan’s enemy is not necessarily their friend. Iran, Hezbollah, Syria, and other Islamic resistance bloc nations and groups are not anti-national, but rather anti-tyranny, which is why the slogans of the Islamic Revolution denounced both capitalism and communism. Given international Zionism’s historical antagonism towards Japan, it is time for the Japanese government to see the truth for what it is and proceed with caution with relations with “Israel,” since breaking off ties too quickly would result in some sort of Mossad-orchestrated revenge campaign, while believing that “Israel” is the friend of Japan will allow the Mossad free reign to conduct a tragic false flag attack at the 2020 Olympics and blame it on Iran, while using their cozy ties with the Japanese government in order to sell the “official story” that Iran did it.

Hopefully the Japanese state not only wakes up to the truth in a similar pivot towards conservative nationalism like the 1930s, but is able to traverse the field of diplomacy in order to keep “Israeli” threats to their national security at bay.

The most recurring story Westerners get about Japan is that their society is old and dying.

The latest polling data shows that 40% of Japanese Millennials are virgins. Every year fewer couples get married and fewer babies are born than the last year. The country’s median age? 46.

This sterility is caused by the Allied imposition of two known race carcinogens: liberal capitalism and feminism.

National Castration 

These two doctrines were foisted upon the once proud nation by General Douglas MacArthur, who brought Jews in his carry-on to help write a new occupation “Constitution.”

The most famous of these Jews was Beate Sirota Gordon, a 22-year-old music teacher who was tasked by MacArthur to write Article 24 on Women’s Rights. In 1946 this law was more extreme on the cultural-leftist front than any piece of comparable American legislation. Other parts influenced by Gordon even included Soviet-style bans on “racism.” (Gordon was a known communist)

In a society where masculine roles as heads of households were carefully harmonized with feminine ones, Article 24 was combined with a propaganda campaign later on that sought to destroy Japanese family formation by guaranteeing women the ability to initiate divorce and abandon the role of homemaker to go work.

During the later period of the Mejii Restoration, women enjoyed many civil liberties and had a national union with a stake in the state, but strong families remained the center of the Japanese ethical-social worldview. Prior to 1945, Japanese law was guided by Confucian principles where closely knit multi-generational families, not individuals, dealt with criminal and civil questions. This led to a healthy country governed by honor rather than profit.

Under this system, women’s social status was tied to how well they raised their children, looked after their husband and respected their elderly parents rather than how much money or consumer products they accumulated.

Today, 75% of Japanese women are kissless, overworked and barren. They are wasting their youth slaving away exploited inside a corporate Groundhog Day nightmare for nothing.

Japanese social conservatives have identified this trend and the occupation-“Constitution” as the cause of Japan’s natal and family woes.

There have been a number of attempts to revise the Jew Gordon’s feminist law to also include rights for families and respect for the elderly, but this is opposed by powerful globalist and capitalist interests within the Wall Street dependent puppet government.

Like the spitz, conservatives bark loudly during election season but always end up in master’s lap.

Shinzo Abe: Sacrificing Honor for World Finance

Shinzo Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party is a market-oriented, socially conservative, and superficially patriotic party that does not apologize for Japan’s role in WW2. In practice, Abe is a neo-liberal beholden to local capitalists. His first stint as Prime Minister led to his resignation after just one year due to the unpopular decision to send Japanese soldiers to fight in Afghanistan.  In 2012 Abe returned to the office of Prime Minister and won some respect for his campaign to revise the Japanese Constitution so that they could re-arm. He has been in power ever since.

Abe’s main issue has been figuring out a way to jump start the sluggish economy with what has come to be known as “Abenomics.” The export-oriented Japanese market has never fully recovered from the end of favorable exchange rates and “trade agreements” with the United States that were effectively subsidies.

After the fall of the USSR, the Clinton administration changed the terms of trade with Japan and growth has slowed ever since. To add insult to injury, the liberal system and nihilistic Western-influenced pop culture has led some very barebones attempts at reviving the birth rate to fail.

What’s truly unique about Japan’s second longest serving Prime Minister is his foreign policy antics. In Asia, it is common knowledge that Jews control international finance and America, and this is used by their intelligence agencies to set diplomatic priorities. Any nation with a stock market has an entry-portal for globalist take-over. China has carefully dipped its toe in this strategy, and Israel is warming to them as America begins to show signs of imperial decline.

Abe appears to be going much further than the Chinese, whose command economy places a check on interlopers. He has even announced an unprecedented mass immigration program to replace native workers and lower their wages that is bound to provoke fury in the populace.

While I was unable in my limited search (I can’t read Japanese) to find direct business or think-tank links between Abe personally and Jewish forces, the Japanese have pragmatically collaborated with world Jewry in the past.

In 1905, Japan became the first colored nation in history to defeat a European power in the Russo-Japanese war. This was all thanks to international Jews looking to settle a score with the Czar. After making a secret agreement with the Emperor, Jacob Schiff and others whipped the West’s finance-capitalists into floating Japanese war bonds. This provided a sudden influx of funds that doomed the Russian navy. This is not speculation, mainstream historians admit to Schiff’s role in deciding the conflict.

More than 100 years later, Japanese plutocracy seems to be cognizant of their growing irrelevance in the global economy, especially as rivals like China continue to overshadow it.

Abe’s gambit here is to fundamentally transform homogenous and coherent Japan into a multicultural, rabidly pro-Israel hell-hole so that they are given seat at the table once again.

Abe started to really lay it on thick in 2018 during an expedition to Israel, where he swore fealty to the Zionist rogue state even though Japan’s superficial interests would be to trade with Israel’s oil-rich enemies.

Noteworthy during this meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu was the dinner. It is known that in Japanese tradition, shoes are considered dirty (spiritually and practically) and are to be removed when entering a private space. Japanese politicians do not even wear shoes inside their offices.

Knowing this, Netanyahu and his chef decided to mock and offend Abe and Japanese culture by serving him food in a shoe!

Abe took it with a nervous smile and said nothing. A furious diplomat later told an Israeli newspaper that it was the equivalent of serving a Jewish guest pork. His Bushido-bound betters in the 1930s and 40s would’ve stood up and walked out. There is no explanation for this callous act by the scummy Israelis other than it being a malicious test to see how far they can push a Shabbos Goy democrat:

Abe’s trips to Europe as of late tend to revolve around Holocaust-signaling and pretending like the Japanese did not share much of Adolf Hitler’s vision. Abe and his party do not acknowledge any of the accusations leveled against their country’s wartime behavior yet pretend to believe the atrocity propaganda spread about their German allies during the war.

The Japanese right’s support for Israel, Holocaust theatrics, and their immigration project appear to be impressing the Jacob Schiffs of our today. Abe was recently named Goy of the Year by the American Jewish Committee. Trump just backed off on his promise to place tariffs on Japanese cars, which was the billionaire class’ biggest fear (the US is their biggest automobile export market).

Abe’s strategy is working in the short-term. Businessmen are creating monopolies in their industries and will continue to rake in profits as their people age, die and are replaced.

But hopefully soon Abe will be forced to answer the most important question of all: does honor have a price?