Editor’s Note: This is the second article on our website that deals with Japan’s relationship with international Zionism. The first article was a primer that dealt mostly with history, and less with contemporary issues, aside from the recent massive gold heist committed by “Israelis” residing in Japan as well as the false flag attack on a Japanese tanker ship meant to frame Iran at the literal exact time that Abe was meeting with Imam Khamenei.

This article deals mostly with contemporary issues in how global Zionism – particularly with its push for countries to take on liberal immigration policies to facilitate mass migration so that native peoples become minorities in their own countries, which weakens the unity of nations which ends up protecting “Israel” from any potential nation which will gain strength to stand up to its various schemes (i.e. IMF banking, Zionist wars, pornography, LGBTQP, etc.) – is affecting Japan vis-a-vis the policies of Shinzo Abe.

However, we should not be pessimistic when it comes to Abe. Post-war Japan was forced to be under the thumb of the West. Of course, some politicians who are under the spell of mental slavery welcome American subversion of their national sovereignty and independence, but many Japanese politicians are nationalists who have little wiggle room to restore their independence. The Japanese Constitution is a big ball-and-chain that prevents many positive political positions from being taken. Japanese nationalist politicians are stuck between rocks and hard places. Shinzo Abe, a former historical revisionist, is one of those politicians. However, this article shows how in some ways he has strayed from his roots.

The purpose of re-publishing this article is in hopes that some of his nationalist inner circle (such as the JINF, a historical revisionist think tank) sees the folly of many of his policies, from liberalizing immigration to neoliberal economics, and convince him otherwise. This is not an attack on Abe-san, but rather a respectful criticism in hopes that he will add to the many positive positions he has taken as Prime Minister by reversing the policies of economic neoliberalism and reducing migration levels to healthy amounts, while supporting economic and cultural incentives towards marriage and childbearing among the Japanese people.

Before the SJWs reading this freak out, being against mass migration is not “racist” nor is it necessarily anti-immigrant. It is fine to have reasonable, limited immigration quotas, where the native peoples and citizens get the most amount of public benefits and constitute the majority of the population. As the video linked above of Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Spectre states, the policy of mass migration is meant to protect the Zionist regime. Through various wars against the global South, unleashing of terrorist proxies across West Asia, and carnivorous IMF loans that bring nations to economic destitution, millions of people are forced to flee their homes. While we should sympathize with their plight as a result of Zio-imperialism, that doesn’t mean we should look at mass migration – a policy endorsed by the same Zionists who destroyed those very countries and created the refugee crises in the first place – as a good thing. The goal is to create a Clash of Civilizations where Christian Westerners are pitted against Muslim Easterners, and both groups are instigated by Zionist infiltrators (Kosherservatives like Breitbart on the right and Trotskyite social democrats like the Southern Poverty Law Center on the left) until the tension reaches fever pitch and (God forbid) a large scale civil war breaks out across Europe and/or America, or at the very least, the lack of unity and trust among people prevents any real opposition to global Zionism from people across religious and political divides.

There is also a bit of hypocrisy of many of these liberals to claim to support indigenous peoples of the world, while at the same time supporting mass migration policies, which ends up further displacing indigenous peoples, further impeding on their land rights as well as employment opportunities. Of course, the main instigator of economic problems is the global institutionalization of usury, via the Federal Reserve, IMF, World Bank, and fractional reserve banking, which causes artificial scarcity, since God made enough for every person’s need, though not everyone’s greed. Mass immigration only plays a supplementary role in contributing to economic woes within the framework of global usury’s artificial scarcity. Zionist-backed fake “conservatives” who solely focus on immigrants as the problem, while not focusing on the bankers as the head of the snake, are only serving the Zionist Clash of Civilizations agenda.

The same can be said about Japan when it comes to being consistent in supporting the right of native peoples to exist on their own land. If the current rate of immigration continues to outweigh the low birthrate, Japan will cease to be Japanese. The land of the Yamato people will be the land of immigrants who care not for the culture of the land and only care about moving up the corporate ladder in whatever company they land a job with, since the dissolution of a native peoples in a society certainly leads to hyper-individualism, whereas people with a common ethnic-religious background have more of a sense of brotherhood. Of course, nationalism does not have to equal supremacism. In the Holy Qur’an, Allah says that He created us into nations and tribes so that we can get to know each other. In that there is a mizan, or balance in Arabic. There are ethnic distinctions between people, but it shouldn’t be a negative connotation or a means for conflict or false senses of superiority (like supremacists have, be they followers of Judaism – a religion based on supremacy – or whites who have been subjected to racist mind programming). Even that, the primary driver of man’s ideology and life goals should not be ethnos, but ethos/logos. Dr. E. Michael Jones tells of his attempts to convince Dr. David Duke of this concept in his book Why Ethnos Need Logos.

The problem of Japan’s birthrate cannot purely be solved by ethno-nationalism. Indeed, many nationalist Japanese who hold anti-American sentiments believe in taking revenge on America for the war on Japan by developing Japan’s economy in spite of its lack of natural resources, which it has done. But this economic development has come at a cost to Japan’s social life. This is the problem with materialistic ideologies. Getting so focused on this dunya, or worldly life in Arabic, has widely affected the desire of the average Japanese person to settle down and create a family, not only a far more worthwhile endeavor when it comes to the wealth of the heart (as opposed to the wealth of the pocketbook, even though Allah SWT provides sustenance for every human being in this world, no matter how small) but as an institution that is literally the foundation of society. This is not a call for Japanese to convert to Islam, unless they discover it to be the objective truth on their own, but rather for them to return to their own traditionalist spiritual roots of Shintoism and Buddhism that will certainly cause them to prioritize the creation of the family unit much more than the status quo of hyper-materialism where your job is your God, your wife, and your children all at the same time. That is why pure ethno-nationalism alone can never solve the issues of gaining national independence and sovereignty for any peoples, because without a spiritual system of morality (rather than a materialistic system), ethno-nationalism can easily turn into ethno-supremacism, which is exactly why the Jewish state of “Israel” is so malevolent: they don’t care that they built their supremacist state on the blood of hundreds of thousands of people, as well as the millions of people killed by the Western wars on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria that they were the primary pushers of. Only a tiny, tiny fraction of Jews can legitimately claim ancestral ties to Palestine, and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s call for a referendum for Palestinians of all faiths to vote on the future of their country will include this extremely small minority of Jews who can actually prove to be Palestinian. The majority of Jews have no ties even to the Children of Israel; the majority of them are converts from Khazaria. But even actual Middle Eastern Jews, like Mizrahis from Yemen or North Africa, certainly have no right to Palestine. Add to that that Jewish ideology is supremacist at its core, so Jewish nationalism will always be supremacist and thus is dangerous to the rest of humanity.

Japanese need to return to their traditional ethos in order to save their ethnos from potential extinction. In the period before and during WW2, Japan had a resurgence of traditional values after a period of liberalism. In the same way, Japan can have a similar resurgence if they wake up.

In this article, the story of how international Jewry helped to get support for the Japanese military to fight against Tsarist Russia as proxy retribution for the Tsar’s crackdown on Jewish money lending practices and alleged “atrocities” of the [highly exaggerated] pogroms demonstrates how in the very early 1900s, Japan’s political establishment were liberal democrats. But with a little behind-the-scenes work by ideological figures in Japanese society, they were able to quickly turn into a conservative nationalist government with pan-Asianist aspirations to help their fellow Asian brothers and sisters throw off Western imperialism and Soviet Bolshevism. It is worth noting that international Jewry also got military support for the Chinese against the Japanese once Japan left its liberalism.

Similarly, we hope that it is articles like these that serve as an underground push towards another an ideological shift – similar to the one that happened in the 1930s – among Japan’s most influential people, because aside from the historical antagonism of international Zionists against Japan (as noted in our first article on this subject), the current antagonism of Japan can result in fatal consequences at worst – such as the possibility for the Mossad to carry out a deadly false flag attack on Japanese soil and blame it on Iran, Hamas, or Hezbollah – or at best, cause Japan to embrace the destructive policies of liberal immigration laws and neoliberal economic policies which will make the Yamato people a minority on their own land. The Japanese people and the Japanese political class must both realize that “Israel” is not their friend. Of course, the government of Japan cannot dream of countering “Israel” in a direct manner like Iran or Syria does. However, they can pursue intelligent diplomatic means of dealing subtle blows to “Israel’s” plans for the region, such as how Japan denied the “official” reports that Iran was behind the false flag oil tanker attack.

It is understandable that Japan may be pushed towards sympathy towards “Israel,” not just due to American pressure, but also due to the Japanese government’s ongoing quarrels with the Japanese Red Army. The Japanese government and intelligence services should know that the JRA’s opposition to the Japanese state and Japanese nationalism comes from their Marxist views, not their anti-Israel views, and the earliest supporters of the Zionist entity’s genocide of Palestine were leftists and Marxists, not conservative nationalists. Additionally, the book Emancipation by Jewish author Michael Goldfarb details Karl Marx’s friendship with Jewish ideologue and proto-Zionist Moses Hess, and how despite their differences, they had influence on each other’s ideas. Hess is the author of Rome & Jerusalem, a major work in pre-“Israel” Zionist intellectual discourse. Therefore, the enemy of Japan’s enemy is not necessarily their friend. Iran, Hezbollah, Syria, and other Islamic resistance bloc nations and groups are not anti-national, but rather anti-tyranny, which is why the slogans of the Islamic Revolution denounced both capitalism and communism. Given international Zionism’s historical antagonism towards Japan, it is time for the Japanese government to see the truth for what it is and proceed with caution with relations with “Israel,” since breaking off ties too quickly would result in some sort of Mossad-orchestrated revenge campaign, while believing that “Israel” is the friend of Japan will allow the Mossad free reign to conduct a tragic false flag attack at the 2020 Olympics and blame it on Iran, while using their cozy ties with the Japanese government in order to sell the “official story” that Iran did it.

Hopefully the Japanese state not only wakes up to the truth in a similar pivot towards conservative nationalism like the 1930s, but is able to traverse the field of diplomacy in order to keep “Israeli” threats to their national security at bay.

The most recurring story Westerners get about Japan is that their society is old and dying.

The latest polling data shows that 40% of Japanese Millennials are virgins. Every year fewer couples get married and fewer babies are born than the last year. The country’s median age? 46.

This sterility is caused by the Allied imposition of two known race carcinogens: liberal capitalism and feminism.

National Castration 

These two doctrines were foisted upon the once proud nation by General Douglas MacArthur, who brought Jews in his carry-on to help write a new occupation “Constitution.”

The most famous of these Jews was Beate Sirota Gordon, a 22-year-old music teacher who was tasked by MacArthur to write Article 24 on Women’s Rights. In 1946 this law was more extreme on the cultural-leftist front than any piece of comparable American legislation. Other parts influenced by Gordon even included Soviet-style bans on “racism.” (Gordon was a known communist)

In a society where masculine roles as heads of households were carefully harmonized with feminine ones, Article 24 was combined with a propaganda campaign later on that sought to destroy Japanese family formation by guaranteeing women the ability to initiate divorce and abandon the role of homemaker to go work.

During the later period of the Mejii Restoration, women enjoyed many civil liberties and had a national union with a stake in the state, but strong families remained the center of the Japanese ethical-social worldview. Prior to 1945, Japanese law was guided by Confucian principles where closely knit multi-generational families, not individuals, dealt with criminal and civil questions. This led to a healthy country governed by honor rather than profit.

Under this system, women’s social status was tied to how well they raised their children, looked after their husband and respected their elderly parents rather than how much money or consumer products they accumulated.

Today, 75% of Japanese women are kissless, overworked and barren. They are wasting their youth slaving away exploited inside a corporate Groundhog Day nightmare for nothing.

Japanese social conservatives have identified this trend and the occupation-“Constitution” as the cause of Japan’s natal and family woes.

There have been a number of attempts to revise the Jew Gordon’s feminist law to also include rights for families and respect for the elderly, but this is opposed by powerful globalist and capitalist interests within the Wall Street dependent puppet government.

Like the spitz, conservatives bark loudly during election season but always end up in master’s lap.

Shinzo Abe: Sacrificing Honor for World Finance

Shinzo Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party is a market-oriented, socially conservative, and superficially patriotic party that does not apologize for Japan’s role in WW2. In practice, Abe is a neo-liberal beholden to local capitalists. His first stint as Prime Minister led to his resignation after just one year due to the unpopular decision to send Japanese soldiers to fight in Afghanistan.  In 2012 Abe returned to the office of Prime Minister and won some respect for his campaign to revise the Japanese Constitution so that they could re-arm. He has been in power ever since.

Abe’s main issue has been figuring out a way to jump start the sluggish economy with what has come to be known as “Abenomics.” The export-oriented Japanese market has never fully recovered from the end of favorable exchange rates and “trade agreements” with the United States that were effectively subsidies.

After the fall of the USSR, the Clinton administration changed the terms of trade with Japan and growth has slowed ever since. To add insult to injury, the liberal system and nihilistic Western-influenced pop culture has led some very barebones attempts at reviving the birth rate to fail.

What’s truly unique about Japan’s second longest serving Prime Minister is his foreign policy antics. In Asia, it is common knowledge that Jews control international finance and America, and this is used by their intelligence agencies to set diplomatic priorities. Any nation with a stock market has an entry-portal for globalist take-over. China has carefully dipped its toe in this strategy, and Israel is warming to them as America begins to show signs of imperial decline.

Abe appears to be going much further than the Chinese, whose command economy places a check on interlopers. He has even announced an unprecedented mass immigration program to replace native workers and lower their wages that is bound to provoke fury in the populace.

While I was unable in my limited search (I can’t read Japanese) to find direct business or think-tank links between Abe personally and Jewish forces, the Japanese have pragmatically collaborated with world Jewry in the past.

In 1905, Japan became the first colored nation in history to defeat a European power in the Russo-Japanese war. This was all thanks to international Jews looking to settle a score with the Czar. After making a secret agreement with the Emperor, Jacob Schiff and others whipped the West’s finance-capitalists into floating Japanese war bonds. This provided a sudden influx of funds that doomed the Russian navy. This is not speculation, mainstream historians admit to Schiff’s role in deciding the conflict.

More than 100 years later, Japanese plutocracy seems to be cognizant of their growing irrelevance in the global economy, especially as rivals like China continue to overshadow it.

Abe’s gambit here is to fundamentally transform homogenous and coherent Japan into a multicultural, rabidly pro-Israel hell-hole so that they are given seat at the table once again.

Abe started to really lay it on thick in 2018 during an expedition to Israel, where he swore fealty to the Zionist rogue state even though Japan’s superficial interests would be to trade with Israel’s oil-rich enemies.

Noteworthy during this meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu was the dinner. It is known that in Japanese tradition, shoes are considered dirty (spiritually and practically) and are to be removed when entering a private space. Japanese politicians do not even wear shoes inside their offices.

Knowing this, Netanyahu and his chef decided to mock and offend Abe and Japanese culture by serving him food in a shoe!

Abe took it with a nervous smile and said nothing. A furious diplomat later told an Israeli newspaper that it was the equivalent of serving a Jewish guest pork. His Bushido-bound betters in the 1930s and 40s would’ve stood up and walked out. There is no explanation for this callous act by the scummy Israelis other than it being a malicious test to see how far they can push a Shabbos Goy democrat:

Abe’s trips to Europe as of late tend to revolve around Holocaust-signaling and pretending like the Japanese did not share much of Adolf Hitler’s vision. Abe and his party do not acknowledge any of the accusations leveled against their country’s wartime behavior yet pretend to believe the atrocity propaganda spread about their German allies during the war.

The Japanese right’s support for Israel, Holocaust theatrics, and their immigration project appear to be impressing the Jacob Schiffs of our today. Abe was recently named Goy of the Year by the American Jewish Committee. Trump just backed off on his promise to place tariffs on Japanese cars, which was the billionaire class’ biggest fear (the US is their biggest automobile export market).

Abe’s strategy is working in the short-term. Businessmen are creating monopolies in their industries and will continue to rake in profits as their people age, die and are replaced.

But hopefully soon Abe will be forced to answer the most important question of all: does honor have a price?

The post Shinzo Abe’s Gambit appeared first on Insight Media.

An influential figure in the global “superclass” says that the “political fault line” for the 21st century is the battle of “globalists vs. nationalists.”

This is a candid admission, in no uncertain terms—echoing what American Free Press has been saying since its inception. It also echoes what Liberty Lobby, the longtime populist institution in Washington (before it was crushed by CIA agents and corrupt judges), insisted for years—that the real conflict in our world today is (and always has been) the fight by nationalists worldwide to preserve their nations’ sovereignty in face of an energetic push by super-rich cosmopolitan elitist internationalists to set in place what has commonly come to be known as the New World Order.

The tired and worn labels of “liberal” and “conservative” never meant anything of consequence, just as there is very little difference, on the major international issues, between the Democratic and Republican Party. The real battle is between the globalists and the nationalists.

This is what David Rothkopf—former managing director of Kissinger Associates, the powerful international consulting firm of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger—asserts in his book, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making, a volume that openly acknowledges the influence of such powerful groups as Bilderberg, the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, even citing the work of AFP editor Jim Tucker and his book Bilderberg Diary, which details Tucker’s many years following the intrigues of those whom Rothkopf calls “the global elite.”

Rothkopf’s book—described as a “taxonomy of the rich and powerful who shape foreign policy and business in our globalized world” and as a “masterful portrait of this century’s global elite”—acknowledges in a chapter frankly titled “Globalists vs. Nationalists” that that there is an emerging “global network of antiglobalists” who stand in opposition to the aims of the New World Order “superclass.”

What is interesting is that Rothkopf actually admits that among the foremost opponents of the agenda of the global elite are such figures as Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez and Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Rothkopf wrote:

At the core of the “anti-network” is a small group of leaders, linked by many shared characteristics and attitudes though they come from widely different regions of the world. They might be characterized as “nationalists,” or opponents of the United States, or critics of Western-led globalization. . . . In their view, globalization is old Western imperialism dressed up in new clothes, and they are reacting to it much as they were trained to react to such incursions. . . .

Whether you characterize it as nationalist vs. internationalist, populist vs. globalist, or anti-neo- imperialist vs. pro-American globalization,” the fact is that the battle lines are drawn.

The fact that a genuine “insider” such as Rothkopf is now openly confirming the nature of the conflict that is now raging on the global stage is a clear sign that the global elite recognize that there are serious forces aligned against their agenda.

Unfortunately, groups such as the John Birch Society continue to promote the globalist line by attacking nationalist figures such as Ahmadinejad, Chavez and Putin, failing to recognize (or perhaps deliberately ignoring) the fact that these leaders stand in opposition to the New World Order.

Ironically, Rothkopf’s chapter reads much like the concluding chapter of this author’s recent work, The Golem, which scores the “Israelization” of American foreign policy and asserts that the United States is now engaged in planning for global war in the name of “democracy” with targets such as Iran, Venezuela and Russia now in the gunsights of the global elite, the high priests of war.

The post Globalists See Iran, Venezuela, Russia as Threats to Their “New World Order” appeared first on Insight Media.

Editor’s Note: Leo Frank was a Jewish-American businessman who raped and murdered a 13-year-old female employee named Mary Phagan. Frank then framed the Afro-American janitor. In court, Frank used a flurry of anti-black racist slurs, including the n-word, which is a product of the deep-seated anti-black racism held within Judaism. However, his false accusations against the janitor did not hold up. The judge sentenced Frank to death, but after the lobbying of powerful Jewish members of the local community, the sentence was reduced. Citizens of the city decided to kidnap Frank from jail and deliver the death sentence themselves in August 1913.

In tragic irony, the group Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith was formed in October 1913, citing Frank’s murder as the impetus, claiming that his lynching was due to “antisemitism,” rather than the fact that he was a rapist and a murderer, and also a racist who wanted to pin his heinous crime on an innocent black man. The ADL claims to be an organization “fighting against hate and bigotry,” while their very foundation is built on protecting anti-black bigotry, and even more morbidly, the anti-black bigotry of a rapist-murderer.

To this day, the ADL lobbies to exonerate and repair the image of Leo Frank in order to protect its own sick, perverted criminal past of having their organization be created in order to cover up the crimes of Jewish supremacism by crying “antisemitism.”

Thanks to the work of the Nation of Islam Research Group, which has published an entire volume on this case entitled The Secret Relationships Between Blacks and Jews Vol. 3, the evidence derived from primary sources not only continues to keep alive the ugly origins of the ADL but also maintain that Frank was indeed guilty and indeed a racist.

How can the ADL – which is founded in covering up the anti-black racism of a rapist-murderer by crying “antisemitism” like the boy who cried “wolf,” and also foments rabid Islamophobia and Iranophobia in order to justify the mass slaughter of the farcical “War on Terror” – claim to be combating hate? They are only trying to distract the masses from finding out who the most racist, hateful group of people are by pointing the fingers at everyone else, and when their own crimes are exposed, they simply slander their opponents as “antisemites,” when they are neither Semites (the pro-Jewish book Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook busts such a myth) and those who expose their crimes are not against Jews as people, but are against their actions. People cannot help how they are born, but they can help how they act. Instead of facing the music on their actions, Jewish supremacists falsely accuse their opponents of simply hating them for the sake of their very existence and incidence of birth.

Now that the ADL is actively pushing for censorship both online and offline – including a censorship-promoting hub based in Silicon Valley that lobbies the major social media giants for more strict “community guidelines” – it is vital for the people of the world to know that the ADL is a beacon of hypocrisy rooted in the barbaric act of rape and murder, in addition to anti-black racism and the framing of an innocent black man.

Can they get anymore hypocritical than using Sacha Baron Cohen – who has made a career making movies centered around negative, racist stereotypes of Middle Easterners – while claiming to “combat hate”? Clearly they are only interested in protecting Jewish supremacism from public discovery.

This article is a compilation of two articles written by the NOI Research Group that should shed more light on the Leo Frank case and pull off the mask of “tolerance” and “anti-bigotry” that the ADL wears in order to cover up the fact that their entire purpose is to protect and defend the bigotry and intolerance of Jewish supremacists and the Zionist regime occupying Palestine.

The Leo Frank Case: Documented Findings

The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume Three: The Leo Frank Case, The Lynching of a Guilty Man is a 536-page study referenced with thousands of footnotes and illustrated with maps, diagrams, and graphics that touch on every aspect of this controversial case. Here are a few of The Secret Relationship’s documented findings (and the page numbers where full references can be found):

• Frank was not targeted by an unruly mob. A 23-member grand jury that included five prominent members of the Jewish community voted for the indictment of Leo Frank. In other words, they all believed there was enough evidence to convict Leo Frank as the sole murderer of Mary Phagan. (See page 52, notes 102-106.)

• The claim that a mob chanted “Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you” at the trial is simply false. The ADL’s own expert, author Steve Oney, told the Jewish Journal: “It didn’t happen.…Jews were accepted in the city, and the record does not substantiate subsequent reports that the crowd outside the courtroom shouted at the jurors: ‘Hang the Jew or we’ll hang you.’” (See pages 163-64, 173-187.)

• Leo Frank himself told a Jewish newspaper publisher, “Anti-Semitism is absolutely not the reason for this libel [murder conviction] that has been framed against me. It isn’t the source nor the result of this sad story.” (Page )

• Anti-Semitism was virtually absent from the case, but anti-Black racism was brutally present: Leo Frank, as leader of B’nai B’rith, publicly and openly referred to Blacks as “niggers.” His defense attorneys used the word “nigger” and other racist slurs dozens of times in court. His main attorney told the jury: “If you put a nigger in a hopper, he’ll drip lies.” And: “Is it possible that you Anglo-Saxon men have forgotten the nature of the negro?….Conley is a plain, beastly, ragged, filthy, lying nigger. Have I overstated that?” Another of Frank’s many attorneys addressed the jury, stating that Conley came from “a law-breaking race.” (Pages 121-23, 128-29, 131-33, 362.)

• Frank argued in court that the many Black witnesses should not be believed—simply because they were Black—and that “negro testimony” was by definition inferior and unreliable. Further, Frank argued to the all-white jury of his peers that murder, rape, and robbery were “negro crimes” and thus, he, a white man, could not have committed the murder of Mary Phagan. (Pages 124-136.)

• Atlanta police did not “frame” Frank; nor did they arrest him because he was Jewish. Both private detective agencies hired by Frank concluded that Leo Frank was the murderer of Mary Phagan. Another attorney hired by Frank similarly found and stated openly that his client was guilty. (Pages 31-34, 47-48, 50-52, 65-66, 91 note 187, 147, 247.)

• Jim Conley was the second Black person that Leo Frank publicly accused of Mary Phagan’s murder. Newt Lee, the night watchman who found the body in the factory basement, was actively targeted by Frank’s hired private eyes. They actually planted a blood-soaked shirt in the innocent Black man’s home, and then told the police where they could find that damning “evidence.” At the same time, Frank altered Lee’s work time card in order to make Lee the prime suspect. (Pages 35-44.) Frank’s attorney, the famous Luther Rosser, had this exchange in open court with the medical expert, related to the planted bloody shirt:

Rosser: The shirt had the odor of blood on it when you first got it, didn’t it?

Yes.

Rosser: Then, wouldn’t the odor of blood have killed the odor of nigger?

No.

Rosser: Then, if a nigger had just put on his shirt and had taken it off in an instant, your nose would “get him”?

Have you ever smelled a negro, Mr. Rosser?

Rosser: More than you ever smelled. I was smelling them before you were born. [Pages 134-135.]

• Leo Frank’s own Black cook, Minola McKnight, signed an affidavit saying she overheard Frank’s wife and mother discussing how Frank had confessed to the murder. She (and her husband) also gave damning evidence of Frank’s movements on the day of the murder that conflicted with Frank’s already weak alibi. (Pages 34, 378-79, 423-428.)

• Leo Frank was caught lying so often and so unapologetically that he was actually his own worst enemy. He refused to take an oath on the Bible, and then refused to be cross-examined by prosecutors. But James Conley withstood sixteen hours of cross-examination—under oath. (Pages 92ff, 122, 136-140, 362-382.)

• After Frank’s conviction powerful Jewish leaders rallied to his defense, but in private documents they admitted that they could not stand Frank’s personality and that he probably was guilty. Albert Lasker ran the top advertising agency in America and financed Frank’s legal defense. His private view of the B’nai B’rith president was harsh and disturbing: “It was very hard for us to be fair to him [Frank], he impressed us as a sexual pervert. (Pages 216-217, 254-255, 322.)

• Frank’s main attorney admitted in open court that Frank’s lewd behavior was “a sign that we are getting more broad-minded…[D]eliver me from one of these prudish fellows that never looks at a girl and never puts his hands on her….” So powerful was the testimony of twenty adolescent girls about Leo Frank’s sexual harassment at the factory that none of his attorneys dared to cross-examine them—not one. (Pages 107-123.)

• Frank supporters tried to hire a Black woman to slip Conley some poison. She identified the plotters in open court. (Pages 262-263.)

• Frank was convicted in Atlanta, but most of the 13 appeals occurred outside Atlanta, and every one of those courts—including the US Supreme Court—upheld the conviction. (Pages 276-277, 282.)

• Prosecutor Hugh Dorsey has been portrayed as an “anti-Semite,” but it was Dorsey who allowed Blacks to testify at the trial, an unprecedented advancement in civil rights. Leo Frank’s attorneys fought this tooth and nail, and did everything they could to keep Blacks from participating in any part of the trial. It was Frank’s attorneys—not Georgia prosecutors—who used their power to eliminate Blacks from the jury pool. Dorsey later became governor of Georgia, whereupon he forcefully condemned the racial violence in his state and in America. The NAACP declared that Governor Dorsey’s stand “greatly enhanced the significance of the anti-lynching crusade.” Frank’s B’nai B’rith—and all Jewish organizations—were totally absent from the anti-lynching movement. In fact, Leo Frank’s main appeals attorney, Louis Marshall, as president of the American Jewish Committee, fought to undermine anti-lynching legislation, calling it “unconstitutional” and a violation of “state’s rights.” (Pages 88, 478-479.)

• Several of Frank’s strongest advocates—including his main lawyer and the man who financed his legal appeals—were both Jewish and open and active members of the American eugenics movement. A generation later Hitler would draw inspiration for his anti-Jewish policies from American eugenicists. (Pages 217, 221-222.)

• Pro-Frank embellishers have claimed that “thousands” of Jews fled Atlanta, but this is a complete myth. Jewish demographers show that the Jewish population of Atlanta actually increased over the weeks, months, and years after the Frank episode. (Pages 330-344.)

• Mysteriously, in 1982 a “witness” named Alonzo Mann materialized, claiming that he was at the factory in 1913 on the day of the murder and saw Conley carrying the body of Mary Phagan. The Nation of Islam meticulously examined those claims and shows conclusively that Mann had given many conflicting stories—in 1913 and in 1982—that are irreconcilable with the known facts and that the aged Mann was very likely coaxed by Frank’s advocates into making his 1982 claims. (Pages 435-464.)

Leo Frank: ‘He is a Murderer, Not a Martyr’

In a recent column in the Atlanta Jewish Times, Rabbi Steven Lebow calls for the Georgia House and Senate to pass a “nonbinding resolution” saying, “In the light of history it is fair to assume that Leo M. Frank was innocent of all charges.” This, he feels, would allow the South to “get beyond” its history of lynching and racist violence. It is incredible indeed that Rabbi Lebow could suggest that the exoneration of Leo Frank—the only Jew ever lynched in America—could ever be recompense for the history of racist terror suffered by Black people. It is estimated that many thousands of innocent Black men, women, and children were dispatched by bullet, rope, or fire, many of these wretched murders occurring after the victims suffered hours of grisly tortures. They received no trials and no judicial process in any form, before their horrifying demise. Rabbi Lebow minimizes these injustices and suggests that Leo Frank—a white man—stand in as the symbol to represent the suffering of all these Black Americans. This is, on its face, absurd.

Leo Frank was a pencil factory manager in Atlanta employing scores of child laborers who spent their precious school years under the worst sweatshop conditions. In 1913, Frank was convicted of luring a 13-year-old employee named Mary Phagan into a corner of the factory where he attempted to rape her, and when she resisted, he murdered her. Frank had the longest and most expensive trial in the state’s history up to that time. And because he was also the president of the Jewish B’nai B’rith, he was able to have the nation’s best lawyers and private detectives working on his behalf. A jury of his fellow white men found him guilty of the murder, and more than a dozen appeals courts—including the United States Supreme Court—reaffirmed the guilty verdict. To this very day, no Black man has ever seen this level of due process—even though the 14th Amendment was enacted to assist the Black ex-slave. The Georgia House and Senate—most certainly the Black members—should reject Lebow’s insulting initiative on that basis alone.

There is quite a bit more that is disturbing about Rabbi Lebow’s audacious proposition.

Lebow claims, “we are living in what I like to call the Newer South…a completely different landscape,” and he insists that we see Leo Frank as the historical marker that separates “old” from “new.” He paraphrases Henry Grady, a white man who championed Southern business development—but for whites and Jews only. Blacks, he stipulated, should be locked in agricultural labor as the engines of the Southern cotton economy, and as maids and servants in the homes of Jews and whites. There would be no “New South” for them. Lebow should ask John Lewis or Andrew Young whether Blacks experienced “a completely different landscape” after the 1915 lynching of Leo Frank.

Rabbi Lebow makes a peculiar claim: “Justice is the debt that the present owes the future.” Then what justice is due the young murder victim Mary Phagan? The Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught that “Justice is the greatest principle of fair dealing. Justice is the law that distinguishes between right and wrong.”

If Leo Frank is exonerated today, who then killed Mary Phagan? How will her death be accounted for? How, in Rabbi Lebow’s calculation, do Mary Phagan and her family receive justice? He avoids the issue for good reason. Unspoken in his directive to Georgia lawmakers (many of whom are Black) is that if Frank is deemed “innocent,” then a Black man named James Conley will be deemed guilty. It is a little detail that Rabbi Lebow deliberately “forgot” to include in his Atlanta Jewish Times commentary. In past writings, however, Lebow was more forthcoming and brazenly claimed, “The actual murderer [was] Jim Conley [who] later admitted to others that he had been the one who had killed that girl.” Both assertions are patently false, and Lebow can prove neither.

Lebow continues: “All bona fide historians now agree that Frank was innocent. Clearing Frank’s name should be easy.” Not so fast. James Conley was the janitor in the factory on the day of the murder. He was called up to the murder scene by a panicking Leo Frank, who ordered the Black man to help him conceal the body. The physical evidence so convincingly supported Conley’s sworn testimony that 12 white male jurors unanimously convicted Leo Frank. So convincing was Conley that Leo Frank refused to be sworn on the Bible in his own murder trial!

It is particularly galling for Lebow to have made such a statement, when he is well aware that one of the top bona fide scholars of the case is right here in Georgia. Mary Phagan Kean, a grand niece of the murdered girl, spent thousands of hours researching the case. She wrote a most fair, balanced, and well-respected book on the subject, titled The Murder of Little Mary Phagan. Her research quite handily confirms the reality that Leo Frank was guilty of that horrific crime. She says that the lynching of Leo Frank was “a very horrible thing,” but that “the truth isn’t really told about Leo Frank….He is not a martyr, he is a murderer.” Rabbi Lebow, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee, and those who have championed Frank’s posthumous cause arrogantly ignore the mountain of evidence confirming the work of Ms. Phagan Kean.

The Georgia House and Senate should understand that their support of Rabbi Lebow’s “resolution” exonerating Leo Frank also convicts an innocent Black man of a horrific crime. Multiple courts of law found that Mary Phagan suffered an appalling demise at the hands of an exploitative employer, Leo Frank. For a century, his supporters, the latest crusader being Rabbi Lebow, have turned Frank into a most undeserving cause célèbre, and in the process they have diminished the life of the young victim Mary Phagan—and they have sullied the name of an innocent Black man, James Conley. Georgia lawmakers should not lend themselves to such an ugly legacy. Leo Frank did irreparable harm to race relations in Georgia and America. Rabbi Lebow and his “resolution” only offer more of the same.

Photo credit: Anti-Defamation League Website

Original articles:

• https://noirg.org/articles/the-leo-frank-case-documented-findings/
• https://noirg.org/articles/leo-frank-he-is-a-murderer-not-a-martyr/

The post Protecting Hate: Anti-Defamation League Was Founded to Protect Convicted Rapist-Murderer Leo Frank appeared first on Insight Media.

Following the meeting of a group of filmmakers, producers and actors with the leader of the Islamic Revolution held on November 15, 2018, Ayatollah Khamenei wrote a message that includes additional points to the ones his Excellency made during the meeting as the meeting was closed down as scheduled, leaving no time for the additional points to be articulated.

Further Reading: The Compassionate Family by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei, available in paperback on the Insight Media Webstore.

The website of KHAMENEI.IR publishes the text and the photo of the handwritten letter of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution — as the points raised by the Supreme Leader can be of interest and guiding for all the members of the community of artists. The message encloses essential focal points regarding the duties of the members of the art community in response to the pervasive soft war staged against the country by the enemies. The following is the full text of the letter:

In the Name of God, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful,

What was planned to be articulated during the speech made during last night’s meeting with dear filmmakers, producers, and actors but not mentioned due to shortage of time:

• The pervasive soft war staged by the enemy today is undeniable.
• However, some deny it, hence themselves forming a part of the soft war.
• In this war, artists and intellectuals resemble the armed forces in an actual military war.
• Some individuals pass by this national event indifferently; some side with the enemies and help them; the first group are irresponsible and the latter are on the side of the enemies. Compared to the armed forces in a military war, one can identify the culpability of both groups.
• Today, in the country, there is a large number of the people who take a responsible position and make great endeavors; this should increase day by day.
• Defending the magnificence of Iran, the Iranian culture, the Iranian family, the glorious movement by the Iranian nation, etc. cannot be achieved merely through rhetoric and letters. Arts must take up the arena.
• The role of movies and TV series is very prominent in this regard.
• Attend to national issues in the series you produce; promote cultural themes such as the dear martyrs; the Sacred Defense; the Islamic Revolution; the Islamic lifestyle; the spiritual, faithful motives of the nation and their manifestations; their resistance against the super criminals and global corrupts; the Arbaeen walk and so forth. Articulate the greatness, independence, courage, scientific and practical capacities of this nation through the language of arts.
• The proper and artistic processing of these themes can be very attractive and popular, both within the country and among other countries and nations.
• Your remarks last night indicated that you share the same concerns. I ask Allah the Great to bestow prosperity on you.

November 16, 2018

The post Ayatollah Khamenei: Denying the Existence of a Soft War Against Islam is Itself a Soft War Trick appeared first on Insight Media.

Editor’s Note: The office of Imam Sayed Ali Khamenei, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, recently released a statement in response to a fake fatwa that was falsely attributed to him, where it claims he stated that polygyny (the Islamic act of a man marrying more than one woman at the same time), is mustahab (Arabic for “recommended,” meaning something that should be encouraged as opposed to just a neutral view, or makruh which means not recommended, which means discouraged but not forbidden).

In this statement, he states that he does not view the act of polygyny as something that should be encouraged. He noted that according to the Qur’an, polygyny is only permissible when the husband has the capacity to be equitable between wives when it comes to rights, obligations, compassion/love, and more. Furthermore, he added that the goal of the stable, loving Islamic family unit is to create a sense of stability, peace, and a solid foundation in one’s household, for the parents and the children. If the act of polygyny disrupts such a foundation, then it is discouraged. He also stated that the subject of polygyny shouldn’t be talked about lightly, especially in front of women. However, Imam Khamenei didn’t say the practice was forbidden. Therefore, strict guidelines are in place for such a practice and it is neither recommended nor discouraged.

However, with billions of people on this planet, there are bound to be a myriad of situations in peoples’ personal lives that justify such a practice, which must be coupled with the man’s capability to be equitable towards all wives involved and to make sure that such a practice won’t break apart the family structure. For example, many families get broken apart when the man does polygyny secretly without the other wife’s/wives’ knowledge – a remedy to this is to make sure everything is above board and the co-wives are friends with each other. There can be many reasons to justify polygyny, a main one that stands out is infertility, but let’s just look at things from a numbers game in relation to the necessity to preserve the stability of the family unit: let’s say that in the Muslim world, there are more women than men. Let’s also say that secularization, post-colonial mindsets, and the career-first/family-second approach by Muslim men and women was abandoned. Let’s also say that given such a lack of anti-family mindset in the minds of many post-colonial Muslims, all Muslim men on earth got married to one woman. If that happened, there would still be women who are unmarried. Islam views celibacy as an oppression and also as a severe risk of falling into sins such as fornication, especially as one gets older. That leaves unmarried women in this equation with two choices: remain oppressed by celibacy, or oppress their souls eternally by committing the sin of fornication. With the latter, they end up shattering the family unit whom they did adultery with the husband (of course, both the man and the woman share the equal blame in the sin). In this theoretical scenario, polygyny is the most logical situation to actually prevent the breaking up of families via the inevitable adultery that would take place. Of course, even in this theoretical scenario, polygyny would only be allowed for those men who would treat their wives equitably and would arrange it in a way where it does not shatter the stability of the family.

Theoretical scenarios aside, the author of this article notes in his treatise below that this situation actually exists in a very real world scenario in the Afro-American community. The racist prison industrial complex locked up disproportionate levels of Afro-American men, which coincided with the economic disenfranchisement of the black male (by eliminating ROTC programs and other career preparedness programs from high schools) while simultaneously having the CIA, NATO, and Jewish-Zionist mafia pump drugs into the black ghettos, which drives the newly unemployed black male youth into drug dealing in order to stay above water, which in turn has led to decades of mass incarceration. In Afro-American society, the number of males are few and the number of females much larger. Among the few black males are those who are even marriage-worthy, most of whom are morally upright believers in God, either from the Muslim faith or Christian faith. For black Christian males, of course their religion only allows monogamy. But for the increasing numbers of Muslims in the Afro-American communities (no, not all of them do so in prison), polygyny could heavily remedy the societal epidemic of children born out of wedlock, thus increasing the stability of their families on the micro level and the stability of Afro-American society on the macro level.

In an age where the LGBTQP movement is now normalizing child drag queens and even pedophilia, why is it that healthy family structures such as polygyny (when practiced properly according to the strict rules mentioned above which guarantee that the rights of the woman and the rights of the family are not trampled on) are viewed as a taboo?

RELATED READING: The Compassionate Family by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei, available on the Insight Media Webstore.

——————————

“The Importance Of Islamic Polygyny, Muta’, and Good Marital Behavior, Especially in African American Society”

In Allah’s Name, The Source of Mercy to All of Creation; The Source of the Mercy to the Believing Congregation. Oh Allah Bless Muhammad’s Soul, and Rain Down Peace on His Household.

Let’s get real. Although all of us who are reading this are not Black, everyone who has a heart should be able to relate. Most of us live in America, or somewhere within the Western Sphere of The New World Order. Check this out. There are more Black babies born out of wedlock than there are born in wedlock This is a statistical fact that should not be lightly dismissed.

THINK. What does this mean?

Real commitment is becoming rarer and rarer. Most Black folks’ sexual unions are Islamically illegal and and many are universally considered immoral. In other words, real committed love being secured before “THE DEED” is done is not normal anymore. And there real committed love generated by these people’s spiritually uncommitted copulation is generally not happening either. Few understand and honor how critically important it is to sign onto a religious Contractual Commitment, likened unto a Biblical-Type Covenant. And that is the key initial factor in sexual morality according to every religion, and sect that claims Abraham as its Patriarch.

Nowadays, unfortunately, these contractual commitments are becoming rarer and rarer, as amoral secular influence becomes stronger and stronger. Folks break their marital contracts during the first ill wind. There is little to no care of whether or not a child issues forth from these unwed sexual unions. Unwed births are so common, using the word bastard is considered mean spirited, and all of the metaphysical inauspiciousness of being born out of wedlock is considered old fashioned, superstitious, and false.

Those couples who do bind themselves religiously, commonly tend to take their nuptial covenants less and less seriously The leading causes of strife in these sexual unions are financial disagreements and infidelity. Infidelity has been defined by the society in which most of us are raised in as he or she having sex outside of what is called “marriage.” Marriage is defined as a one man one woman familial relationship, except in some states that include men marrying men and women marrying women.

The one-man-one-woman formula would be ideal in an ideal world. Our Western world is far from ideal. Black women grossly outnumber black men here in The U.S. in civilized society. By Civilized Society I mean the society on the other side of those jail house walls. America has the largest per capita prison population on earth. Black men represent less than 7% of the population of the United States Of America. But Black men represent well over 60% of the largest prison population on the planet.

The overwhelming majority of Black Men are in prison for non-violent crimes. But as convicted felons they are literally “Black Balled” once they return to civil society. They can’t (I REPEAT… C A N N O T) get good jobs. They have a much harder time getting into good colleges and universities. They can’t even vote. It is like Dr. King didn’t defeat Jim Crow after all. A wonderful Christian sister, Michelle Alexander, wrote a must read book entitled The New Jim Crow, written by this highly successful Black lawyer and civil rights advocate, The New Jim Crow uncovers the truth of the plight of Black Men in this society, but barely touches on the strain that having so few Black men in our civil society puts on Black women sexually.

Black men are systematically being targeted in this country. This for sure is not new. Black men have always been in the cross hairs of the dominant racist segment of America. Black men are still the first ones fired and the last ones hired. If one of our little criminals, who were systemically and racially cut out of the legitimate economy gets busted for selling drugs, they throw away the key.

A white boy is more apt to get off with a warning. A Black BOY will most likely be forced to do hard time in a prison system that’s designed to make their prisoners worse… not better.

Why? Because it’s in the best interests of the prison system that felons return quickly. Why? Because many prisons are privately owned, and government sponsored. Money talks. You know what walks. It’s as simple as that.

We know that there is a conspiracy in this country to destroy black boys. There are many academic studies that have been published on this obvious conspiracy (not so obvious to working and middle class White folks and Negroes who haven’t been paying attention). The schools are feminine. Black boys can’t relate. This is by design, not by accident. Dig it. Gangs didn’t just appear. We know this.

Add all this to the fact that Black On Black homicide kills as many young black males between the ages of (something like) 17 and 35 as the body count was in the Korean Conflict and Vietnam put together… EVERY SINGLE YEAR. Thus a mathematical certainty appears in front of anyone’s eyes. It’s basic arithmetic.

Since fewer and fewer Black men have the cultural bent, or (and) the religious convictions to effectively and morally solve their problems, social and economic pressures drive them to acts of desperation. These acts are often both illegal and morally corrupting, and they generate a highly predictable outcome. More and more Black men end up in The Racist New Slavery Prison System.

Thus, there are too many women to match up one woman to one man which is the only acceptable family unit that most “decent” African American Communities subscribe to. It is simply a mathematical impossibility. If everyone practiced it, there’d be a huge number of sisters left celibate for the rest of their lives or until, some married sister died, or was divorced. Adultery and fornication is how the problem is tackled in this illogical, inhumane monogamous matrix.

There are just too many more Black women in civil society than there are Black men… WAY WAY WAY more, and there’s even a greater ratio between so called GOOD BLACK WOMEN and GOOD BLACK MEN… whether you’re talking educationally good, economically good, religiously good, well behaved good, or a combination of all of them or some mix thereof. The higher your standards, the slimmer the pickins. DIG THIS. There are entirely too few men to scratch “the itches” of so many women as devoted spiritual/social/sexual familial mates. Yet this unrealistic and arbitrary European Trinitarian monogamous marital system is the cultural bent of most American Women, and men, Black or White.

As a result, the competition to attract and hold a man is fierce. Many young men, realizing that there’s a sexual smorgasbord out there, change partners like they change underwear. Failure at doomed relationships born out of promiscuity, turned many of these women sexually cynical, and down right whorish, if not bi or homosexual.

These women have lived the results of the above statistical demographics. They’ve given up. There’s no handsome prince-like man coming to rescue them from sexual comatose with a true love kiss, or save them from a dragon whose lustful fiery breath turned their moral values and principles to distasteful ash, and imprisoned their sense of decency in a tower of broken hearted promiscuity.

These babes are not looking to marry. They just want to have that itch heterosexually scratched every now and again by any means necessary. Some have become bisexual. Others are willing to be satisfied by more than one stud who will use them every now and again for a once a month “booty call,” After some of these women reach thirty something, it’s the women who’re doing the booty calling. Dig it.

Who is using whom?

Many women whose hearts have been broken and squeezed into a lump of black coal dust, can’t even recognize the higher levels of male female relationships anymore. So, many of them will dress the part of a harlot in a hot New York Minute. Some of these sisters are highly educated, and professionally successful. They simply weren’t fortunate enough to be picked in the first rounds of the marital draft. So, they did not get the pick of the litter when they were young. So instead of hooking up with an older, already mated man in their class (if not economically, at least spiritually, intellectually, and politically), which social taboos placed out of their reach, they kept shopping. A girl has to have her standards. Unfortunately, most of these “standards” tend to be shallow, unrealistic, and “girlishly” immature. So, these “girls” keep choosing THE THRILLER, over, and over, again until they’re thrilled to spiritual death.

The answer to these sickening trends is Islam. Both Muta’ and Polygyny are valuable Islamic social institutions that can help purify some of the nastiness that’s going on in the community. And you immigrants who’re reading this essay, don’t think that the nastiness hasn’t touched your little Ahmad, and Faridah, better think again, and again, and again.

You sent them to public school. You have no idea of the pressure you put them under, because you were educated in the mother land. You see but you don’t see. So many of your girls are still single at 35, and you’d be shocked at how many have done the deed in secret. You’re not with them 24/7, and you can barely speak each other’s language. Do you really care to know what’s going on behind your back? Or is it out of sight out of mind? And the ones who have remained chaste, are living in a fantasy world of want and frustration, that’s a pitiful, shameful oppression.

Unfortunately, too many folks who are coming into this religion, as well as those who have been in this religion since birth look at Islam with a very distorted lens. Some are ethnocentric. They’re searching for or prioritizing a racial, national, or ethnic identity. Some just want to get a good man, or a good woman. Most immigrants just came here to become affluent, and safe. And too many immigrants, second generation indigenous Muslims, and converts, have no idea of what’s going on right in front of their eyes. And many of them don’t care.

Submission to Islamic principles and values has been made conditional… placed behind your ethnocentric cultural. Faith is on the verge of being terminally weak on the group and individual level. Some converts often still have the same values and principles that they had when they were out there in the streets, partying, fornicating, and masturbating. Some immigrants still have the same values and principles that they had in the old country, prioritizing neocolonial privilege & status, over community building around the dynamic Islamic Center of Daily Congregational Salat, Dua’, Islamic Education, and Community proselytizing.

How many of us really want to see real social change… IF… we’re the ones who have to do the changing? How many of us want to actually practice the customs of Prophet Muhammad, and the valued principles and practices of Islam to the extent that we totally turn away from the Western and Eastern “marital” cultural practices, principles, and values, and unilaterally adopt The Islamic Ones? How many women are ready to live with the basic fact that an Islamic family CAN morally hold more than one woman, and in some cases… SHOULD?

The basic principal in family is love. And love is wanting for THE LOVER what THE LOVER wants. So, how many of us working class, fairly affluent brothers and sisters will dare to empathize with that deserving sister that’s in our own association? I’m not talking about the foolish sister, or the sister who is teetering on the verge of insanity. I’m talking about that really good Quran knowing, strictly practicing, single sister who deserves the comfort, bliss, support, and dignity of a zauj who is like her, and likes her? Or the true Muslimah who is active and obviously striving to develop her deyn.

Will one of you adopt her into your family? Or will the lot of you condemn her to have to settle for a fool, a sinner (fasiq), or celibacy? Who will read the reality of the situation in the name of your Lord Who Creates, Worshiping Allah As AlWadud… The Ever Present Lover… wanting what Our Ever Present Lover Wants Us To Do As His Representative On Earth… following His Holy Messenger’s Perfect, and Obvious Example? Who has the loving heart to propose a familial alliance to that sister?

How many of us really want to turn away from the Post-slavery-isms, and Neocolonialisms that still enslave and dominate our thought process, and turn towards the life of Prophet Muhammad (S) for infallible guidance? How many brothers really want to come together to learn how to be good men? Or do yawl just congregate to watch sporting events, having insipid conversations like…

“Will Money Mayweather get that fight with Pac-man after all?” Do you sisters really want to come together to learn how to be good women? Or do you just come together to gossip and rag against men’s natural inclination towards sexually connecting with more than one woman?

God Help us all.

Divorce amongst Muslims in the Western World is off the charts. Folks don’t know how to behave at all. Sex is cheap. Love is undefined and rare. Pity is considered foolish, along with loyalty. Males are forcing the issue of polygyny rather than negotiating it, after lying during and after courtship about their determination to be monogamous.

Women are denying masculine nature but at the same time titillating it incessantly and formidably, choosing the easiest one’s to “catch” to mate with… the ones who swear up and down that they will comply with their demands while demanding nothing in return from their “Queens.” These easily caught brothers have to navigate in a cultural matrix swarming with needy, pitiful, pleading/demanding, nearly irresistible, deserving, and undeserving, super attractive women, Black, Brown, White, Yellow, and Red Women at work, school, the laundry mat, the bus stop, the bank… hey… you name it. Then these same siren sisters wonder why it was so easy for another siren sister to do the same “catching” of the same brother. Come on. Get real.

Islam is the answer. Hypocrisy and weak, selfish spirituality is the problem. We truly need a revolution of consciousness, conscience and behavior. And it better happen quickly. If you think this generation is bad. What is the next one going to be like if the big fix is delayed much longer?

Addendum: “You Must Want For Your Brother What You Want For Your Self.” This is one of the Muslims’ most important, and commonly known self-evident Islamic Principles. This charitable concept applies to women on one level even more so than it does to men. For it is virtuous for a man to be reasonably jealous that another man should lay with his wife. But it is a great sin for a woman to be jealous of another woman to lawfully lay with her husband. In that way the sisterhood finds a kind of familial strength that the brotherhood cannot naturally even entertain. Unfortunately, The Muslim Sisterhood is woefully lacking, these days, in sisterly empathy for their less fortunate religious sisters, and are consequently failing dramatically in this realm of Islamic Virtue.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“MUTAH; An Islamic Alternative to Dating: VIEWED FROM AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE”

Al-Islam, the religion of the Muslims, recognizes that the human sexual drive is normally natural, healthy and (under the auspice of the spiritual/social contract of marriage) ordained by God Almighty. Allah created sex. Muslims are commanded not to consider sex as something shameful or bad in men, or women.

However, like any other appetite, we have been taught by Allah through His Prophet to control the sexual drive. Muslims are allowed to eat all the clean foods of the earth. However, we are told not to let our appetites turn us into greedy gluttons. We are to observe moderation. Muslims are not encouraged to be vegetarians. Muslims are allowed to eat any kind of properly killed, clean meat. Yet, The Prophet Muhammad has been reported to have said, “Do not turn your bellies into a graveyard for animals.”

Once again, guide lines have been Divinely set, and even within those guidelines, moderation has been encouraged. Behaving outside of these Divinely set guidelines, beyond the realm of moderation is an offense against God, and our own human nature. In other words, this kind of deviant behavior is a sin.

Muslims universally consider fornication a great sin. However, fornication is considered a crime in an Islamic state. The punishment for being tried and convicted of fornication is a very severe beating. Adultery, however, is considered a crime punishable by death.

Modern folks tend to believe that sexual misbehavior, considered not only sinful, but unlawful for thousands of years, is healthy human behavior. It is the arrogant secular aversion for the concept of theocratic governance and law that has caused this unchaste paradigm shift. “The government has no right to interfere with what a person does in the privacy of their own bedroom, and death is really a inhuman punishment for adultery,” modern man screams unabashedly.

In a very real since, Islam agrees.

Though Allah has legislated severe penalties for being convicted of breaking these sexual laws, it is very, very difficult to actually convict a person on charges of fornication or adultery. The burden of proof is on the accuser. And Islam requires a preponderant amount of proof in order to convict, and at the same time holds invasion of privacy a serious crime, forbidden by individuals and government agencies.

Law enforcement has the right to infiltrate your organization if it suspects you of murder or violent civil or political intrigue. The government does not, however have the right to put cameras or spys in your bedroom to investigate your sexual behavior.

These penalties are designed more as a deterrent, and Muslim governments, even theocratic ones, have always practiced a strict policy of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” Allah legislated these severe punishments for fornication, and adultery to punctuate the statement that these anti-social sexual acts are lethal assaults on the institution of family, and therefore un-Islamic, unnatural and intolerable.

It is very difficult to convict someone of adultery or fornication in an Islamic court. However, though Islam is not permissive, Islam is not prudish. Islam is a middle ground fostering love, family, nature and sanity.

Islamic law frowns upon and vigorously discourages premarital sex, no doubts about it. Yet Islam, according to the Jafaria (Shia) School Of Jurisprudence, was never meant to be Victorian, stiff and unreasonable. Youth is the springtime of life, and even in many older people, sexual energy runs high.

Though the sap in some youngsters may be running heavily, it is often too soon for young birds to fly free of the nest. Modern social-economic pressures demand four years of high school; four years of college (for some) and (for an elite few) four or more years of graduate school. Often times this university level work is done in Western or Eastern countries where Muslims are a rarity and Islam is a novelty.

In these countries sexual stimulation is universal, inadvertent, indiscriminate and casual. Sexual promiscuity is normal. Indecency (skimpily clad females) is considered a prerequisite for social acceptance. Fornication is a social duty, and chastity is a word lost to antiquity. Who is foolish enough to believe young Muslim men and women should remain sexually starved, lonely and frustrated especially in these kinds of sexually stimulating environments until they turn 30?

Many Muslim youths brought up under these adverse conditions do not remain chaste. Many contract nikkah (a standard marriage) just to maintain their sanity. Others fall or dive into sin, and oftentimes can not climb back out from it. Much of the loose family ties and moral corruption that has been introduced into Muslim countries happened due to a domination of the Western all’s-fair-in-love-and-war values while Muslim students studying abroad. These un-Islamic values dominate because the real Islamic values had never been taught to them in the first place. In most Muslim countries, Muslim Victorianism dominates, and the beauty of Islamic practices and philosophies are ridiculed with little or no open minded study.

For many American and European converts, becoming Muslim has been like “joining a convent or monastery.” In non-Muslim countries finding a mate who will be compatible with your commitment to God, Prophet, his way of life and the world community of Muslims, is most times, very difficult.

Many non-Islamic women think practicing Muslim men a nice novelty. They feel Muslim men are good providers who respect their women better than most. Therefore some non-Muslim women often see Muslim men as a “good bet.”

Non-Muslim men see practicing Muslim women as submissive and devoted. In many cases, these opinions of good Muslim men and women are true. But often, the non-Muslim party wants a Muslim, but does not want to live an Islamic lifestyle.

As a result, painful divorce amongst American and European Muslims is high. The more religious a person (who is Muslim) is, the greater is his or her chances of being married to loneliness.

Many years of loneliness can take a great toll on a person’s resolve. The temptations are many. Satan presses the attack aided by all kinds of social pressures. Many allow the excuses to become “legitimate,” and find themselves doing what they did before they became Muslim. They fornicate.

“I just can’t go though another hellified marriage with a person who just won’t do right and won’t let me do right, in peace. And I don’t believe ALLAH wants me to castrate myself.” So they fornicate.

Many youngsters and elders make a nikah (permanent marriage) with a total stranger, compelled by sexual need thrown in overdrive because of loneliness over a long period of time. Many of these marriages lead to either a life long unhappy marriage or divorce. Both tends to leave children either without a parent and (or) with shaken faith, warped perceptions about members of the opposite sex, and a focus traumatically dislodged from a God-conscious center. Some men and more women apostate as a result, and/or suffer severe emotional imbalance.

During the time of Prophet Muhammad, many Muslims were faced with many of the same social problems. The Muslims in Mekka were few. They were usually young, poor and socially disadvantaged. Making nikah with women whose faith was suspect was a big problem, and later in Prophet’s mission, Allah forbid Muslim men from marrying polytheists, and a Muslim women from marrying polytheists, Christians, Jews; all non-Muslim men.

Just as now, single Muslim women were rare. The Islamic social tradition pertaining to the proper etiquette between unmarried men and women were very strict, as they are these days. The preservation and development of male and female chastity and modesty has always been and always will be one of the cornerstones of Islam. Yet, during Prophet’s time, just as today in the west, many non-Muslim women could not warm up emotionally to a man if they did not have some sort of romantic dealings with him first. Especially not a man who was poor.

The early Muslims, especially the young scholars and gnostic who were partisans of the boyish Iman Ali, were dirt poor. People like Ammar, and Bilal were much too poor to attract the interest of a good, chaste maiden’s father or brother, and it would have been an offense to their modesty to woo a young woman directly. Super men like these simply remained chaste, kept their balance and thrived spiritually. But for others, these problems had to be solved.

An institution that existed before the time of Prophet (S) called Mutah (temporary marriage) solved many of these problems.

Emotionally, mutah is very similar to the American practice of going steady. Mutah, however, is religiously binding. Any children resulting from a union in Mutah are the moral and legal responsibility of the father. Any children from a Mutah union inherit just like children from a nikah union. Begetting children, however, is not encouraged in mutah relationships.

Coitus interrupts and other reasonable birth control methods were and are encouraged often times in temporary (mutah) marriages. Non-sexual mutah is also frequently encouraged. This is a temporary marriage where the parties agree to abstain from sexual intercourse, but lifts the restrictions that separate males and females in Islamic culture. Plus, if at anytime BOTH parties agree to lift the non-sexual restriction from their mutah, they can also legally enjoy sexual intercourse.

As you see, Mutah is different from going steady in that:

1. Mutah contains the dignified status of a 15 hundred year marital religious custom.
2. Offspring are legitimate in that their parents are bound spiritually. Children inherit and must be legally provided for.
3. Unlike a nikah, mutah MUST be contracted within the knowledge and consent of the family, especially the girl’s family. She is the one who’s liable to be impregnated by a lust driven experiment, after being seduced by a worldly sexual predator who’d take advantage of her vulnerability. This is a safeguard that’s missing in dating and going steady. And it is one of the most abused facets of mutah.
4. Mutah is not promoting promiscuity like going steady.

In Mutah, like Nikah, a woman vows to wait 3 (three) menstrual cycles before entering into any other marital relationship, at the culmina tion of a mutah. This makes identifying the paternity of offspring if impregnated, a lot easier. The 3 cycle waiting period is called iddah. Iddah not only prevents confusion as to the parentage of the off-spring; it prevents unchecked passions from creating situations where unscrupu- lous women motivated by lust, passion and greed are jumping in and out of strange men’s beds like prostitutes.

The difference between nikah and mutah is simple. Nikah is designed to be permanent. Mutah is designed to be temporary. In mutah, there must be a certain duration of time set, after which the relationship must be renewed, and made permanent (nikah) or terminated. The time limit can vary from a day, months, and/or years. It depends solely on the couple who are making mutah.

In this way, unlike going steady, men and women who enter into a relationship of mutah are under no pretension, or sophomoric, unrealistic illusions. They enter into a mutah knowing the purpose is to enjoy one another sexually, or non sexually. It is a social/sexual experiment. It is not permanent. They do not have to pretend that the lust they feel for one another is love. They are free to enjoy one another under the restrictions of mutah, without the rigid formalities Islam imposes on men and women who are uncommitted to one another. Being thus free, they can explore each other’s character to see if they are compatible beyond the sexual.

They can touch, hug, kiss and speak affectionately to each other. Although intercourse in some mutah cases is not encouraged, they can, in fact, go all the way, if both parties agree. Nevertheless, they are spiritually wedded and under Islamic precedence, legally married.

They must, however, bear in mind that their marital relationship is limited in time, privilege and responsibility. And if the woman does become impregnated, they are duty bound to provide a permanent, stable family relationship for that child.

Mutah provides a sane, practical, and responsible method for a God-fearing Muslim man and woman to become familiar with one another, and to enjoy each other’s company and affection, recognizing that this union is experimental and not permanent by design. It was not instituted to last. It will not endure. If it is to evolve into an established family, mutah must be dissolved and reconstituted as a nikah.

In this way, Islam provides a way by which promiscuity is checked, yet a responsible couple has license to drop normal Islamic frigidity traditionally imposed on members of the opposite sex.

Thus, healthy, warm, close, caring and often times meaningful sexual relationships can be entered into by responsible Muslim men and women who do not necessarily want to set up housekeeping.

This is a middle ground between Victorian prudishness, and American licentiousness. We believe this middle ground is a healthy, sane, God instituted and necessary outlet, especially in Western society. Islam recognizes the need for many men and women to have close contact with members of the opposite sex before nikah because of circumstances, and or personal preference. Islam also recognizes the need for strong social restraints to be placed on sexual relationships, but it also recognizes the need for a middle ground between celibacy and life partnership.

We humans have the potential to be like angels trapped in flesh. We are simultaneously gross physical matter and extremely fine light energy. Angels are pure creative energy–the essence of light. Humans are created from a combination of mud and blood, plus pure creative energy.

The earth is a field of struggle in which each and every human is duty bound by Divine Decree to raise in consciousness, attitude, associations and behavior from a low animal level to a high angelic level. One must overcome the pull of the beast within to accomplish this mission.

The animal nature relentlessly drives the human will to gratify the lower, gross appetites at all cost and by any means whatsoever. The animal nature has no regard for any propriety, decency, modesty or long term effects. Faith, selflessness, modesty, chastity, humility, moderation, temperance, etc., have no relevance on the animal level.

On the level of sex, the animal drive can become oppressively obsessive. It can dominate one’s thoughts, arrange one’s priorities, and breakdown the boundaries that separate human beings from beasts. It can get gross; very, very nasty and very ugly. Yet, the soul possessed by sexual lust will view it as something great, good, natural and sensitive. In this society, (in America) men and women enter into sinful sexual relationships as early as 12 and 13 years old. They don’t usually enter into marriage, however, until they are in their mid to late 20’s.

Men and women in lust crazed states of mind and geopolitics, flirt with one another like dogs. They arouse one another casually at school, work and their places of worship. In their mating rituals called parties, however, they cast all caution to the wind.

Drinking alcohol to destroy their mind’s natural inhibiting defenses, flirtation is deliberate, serious, and effective. Both male and female attire is immodestly revealing, tight fitting and sexually seductive. Dancing is the primary activity of clubs and parties. They jump, step, pose and gyrate in front of one another in all kinds of sexually suggestive dances. Some dances require the dance partners, who are sometimes total strangers, to press their bodies together and rhythmically rub their private parts against each other’s bodies through their clothing.

They kiss, touch, and pet one another in a dark room filled with people with the sound of romantic and/or arousing music, plus alcoholic drinks and other socially acceptable, if not socially legal intoxicants (drugs); many of which like cocaine and marijuana are aphrodisiacs (sexual stimulants).

Many couples are introduced in this party atmosphere. Sometimes they flirted with one another casually for weeks or months at school, or work or even at their place of worship. So by the time they get to the party, they want each other passionately.

After dancing and drinking, touching and looking, the aroused animal level has suppressed the spiritual level altogether. All the sermons, the moral lessons, the personal values are tossed out the window (if there ever were any in the first place). Lust dominates, and as soon as they can arrange to be alone, they will RUSH toward one another to copulate like dogs in heat. No need for words. No promises. No poems. Just sex; raw dry iced and nasty.

They usually find themselves still unsatisfied…still unfulfilled. In fact, they are oftentimes more frustrated than they were before they fornicated. Because unlike animals, most humans, especially young ones, have something called a conscience. In addition, all humans, unlike animals, have intellects and other sensitivities that must be tended to at the same time as their lusts. If these sensitivities go untended, the sex act often fails to reach a state of fulfillment.

In women, this is a source of extreme frustration and in men it is a cause of deep embarrassment and feelings of inadequacy. So because of a social norm that promotes fornication, a Pandora’s Box filled with all kinds of emotional, psychological and physical problems are uncovered and released upon an unsuspecting people who end up oppressed and oppressing in a frustrating state of unchecked lust.

The Qu’ran and Prophet Muhammad were sent to help spiritually conscious people to conquer these immoral states. But it was never intended that Muslims would become cold-blooded prudes. Muslims are not allowed to legally become dogs, but Prophet himself encourages Muslims to be sensitive, warm, gentle and romantic, and highly competent and effective lovers.

This cultural prudishness that frowns on mutah, encourages sight unseen nikah, and turns a blind eye to zinah (fornication) is the work of the Devil; Shaytan ArRajeem. This is not Islam. This is not submission to Allah. This is not a real desire to adopt the ways of Prophet Muhammad. This is cultural slavery, ancestor worship of sorts. This is the same kind of culturally inspired social hang-ups that have many Muslim women dressing like Americans, Africans and Hindu pagans; bearing their hair or wrapping it when Allah’s orders are too clear to be controversial. Allah! Allah!

As a result, our weakest people, mostly young, resort to illegal, immoral, sinful sex. Foreign students while here in America and Europe and newly converted indigenous Americans, who are sometimes the strongest and strictest Muslims in the community, are forced to endure a life of unnatural, anti-Islamic celibacy for sometimes over a decade after they come to this country or enter into Islam. How cruel, and thoughtless! How completely deviating from the Islamic Model.

Mutah is a God send. It is so much deeper than going steady. Though going steady carries a vague sense of commitment, it oftentimes is done after the parties have fornicated. Mutah is spiritual, dignified, lawful, just and humane. In mutah the spiritual (or at least the intellectual level) must be somewhat compatible. Both parties must agree that there exist between them, higher degrees of compatibility other than just sexual. They have to explore each other through conversation at least long enough to agree on a time set, a gift for the woman as a token of their contract in wedlock, and a simple vow which is binding in the court of Allah.

Only then can a Muslim claim to be wedded under the sanctuary of mutah. Only under this umbrella can a Muslim man and woman intimately explore, experiment and develop their sexual compatibility at an intermediate state between the rigid social restrictions Islam imposes on uncommitted inter-sexual relationships, and the very heavy, nearly indelible social-religious responsibilities a couple vows to undertake when they set up housekeeping Islamically through nikah.

Without mutah the only other alternatives would be “going together,” which is nothing but fornication; celibacy until nikah, and nikah often times with a person who is a virtual stranger and suspect as to his or her compatibility on many levels.

Intercourse itself is a biological marriage. Allah calls on all who believe and submit to His Will as it is unveiled by The Muhammadan Tradition, to call on the Divine Agency to legitimize and sanctify their sexual union. Sexual desires are real, healthy (for the most part), and all too human and natural. Sometimes the satisfaction, of these legitimate and natural desires need a legitimate institution between sexual segregation and setting up housekeeping, to insure that these less serious sexual encounters remain fair, just, spiritual, clean and sane.

One may naturally need a sexual partner, but for whatever social, economic or spiritual reason that person may not need and/or want a life partner. Though a life partnership is not desired, Allah has not damned natural sexual need. Rather Allah has instituted a most human and dignified method to fulfill these sexual needs when contracting a life partnership is undesirable and/or unwise. When the need to be sexually and/or socially closer than is Islamically acceptable and under uncommitted circumstances and conditions arises, Allah says protect and preserve moral decency and purity by employing the Divine Agency of Mutah.

OH ALLAH BLESS MUHAMMAD’S SOUL,
AND RAIN DOWN PEACE ON HIS HOUSEHOLD.

The post Nation Building for God’s Sake: In Defense of Islamic Polygyny and Muta appeared first on Insight Media.

A comprehensive and truthful narrative of History, and of the present as it unrolls, would inevitably generate objectives and strategies so sharply focused and so clear, as to Liberate the Discourse, thereby creating the first steps to future success.

Applied to the Palestinian suffering, it appears that despite the fact that the horrific crimes committed against Palestinians and against their country are extremely well documented, Palestinians are struggling with little to no success since seven decades to stop the killing machine which took their land, ethnically cleansed them and continues to commit massacres generation after generation.

Palestinian Solidarity Movements have been active for decades, yet have failed to stop the genocide, and failed to save Palestinian land from being robbed and turned into Jewish only settlements, and failed to save the lives of tens of thousands who have been killed by the murderous Jewish collective that calls itself “Israel”, who continues the massacres worse than ever.

Having such comprehensive damning evidence to the crime, yet failing to stop its chronic corrosive continuation, and failing to bring one single criminal to face prosecution is mind boggling.

We really need to stop for a moment and ask ourselves this vital question:

Why this epic failure. Why, despite having evidence and documentation in such great number and such horrific nature, that it would easy to indict and to prosecute the perpetrators, and lock them behind bars forever, and yet they remain unpunished, Why?

Equipped with just a modicum of critical mind, a tiny scratch to the surface, would suffice to any person concerned with the defense of Palestinians’ Rights, to become aware of problematic issues which hinder the Palestinian discourse, weaken its potential and render it impotent.

My humble attempt to identify the causes resulted in the following:

Our movement has been infiltrated, manipulated and betrayed by steering it in a manner which would always PROTECT the perpetrators and their interest while chanting “we support Palestine”

Our movement has been framed with inbuilt elements of distractions, so that it would continue to criticise and pretend to fight the crimes committed against our people, without ever offending the occupiers let alone causing serious damage to their criminal entity or harm to their interest.

Four walls/ red lines have been drawn to our supporters, by hijackers and infiltrators, which keeps them running like hamsters in a mill, but never actually accomplishing anything.

Their purpose is to block intellectual discussion, obstruct rational and scholarly debate, filter vital information and serious research that examines four main issues which if freely examined would result in ultimate exposure then prosecution of perpetrators:

1) The problem of the Ideology of Jewish Supremacism

2) The problem of Global Jewish-Zionist Networking and Lobbying

3) The problem of idolizing the Holocaust (used as a tool to further Zionists aims)

4) The problem of the use of False Flag operations

a) Under the pretext of fighting racism and anti-Semitism, the hijackers aim to obfuscate and cover up any study or scrutiny of the ideological core of Jewish supremacy and racism.

b) Under the pretext of fighting racism and anti-Semitism the goal of the hijackers is to block and prevent serious investigation of global Jewish Zionist networks and organizations in their respective Jewish communities worldwide, and their vital role in supporting, defending and protecting the criminal Zionist entity.

c) Under the pretext of the uniqueness and exceptionality of Jewish suffering, they aim to justify the need of the perpetual existence of a “state for the Jews”, a “homeland for the Jewish people” in Palestine, an “Israel”, a “safe-haven” where the “eternally persecuted” Jews can finally call “home”, where they can exercise their “sovereign rights” to be a “nation”; be it as it may, an invented one, and be it as it may at the expense of another nation and the almost total extermination and dispossession of another people through wars of conquest and genocide. They call their omnibus solution, a Secular state for ALL its citizens. Hence preparing the ground for the soft, cultural, factual and permanent TAKE OVER of Palestine (early Zionists called that type of soft takeover, Cultural Zionism).

d) Under the pretext of avoiding “conspiracy theories”, we are forbidden from examining the role of FALSE FLAG operations, a specialty “perfected” by Mossad, and thus fail to identify real culprits and point our accusations at the wrong target.

e) Under the pretext of the uniqueness and exceptionality of Jewish suffering, our detractors want to impose on Palestinians to give up their rights to resist and defend themselves, they want Palestinians to abandon the idea of LIBERATION and reinstatement of their stolen land, and to impose on them the acceptance of sharing permanently their land with those who oppressed and dispossessed them for decades, those who have systematically violated, desecrated and destroyed the beloved land of Palestine.

How this works on the ground, on basis of a few case-study incidents that are quite revealing:

FIRST CASE

Some years ago, I was invited by a group of anti-Zionist Jewish “friends” to attend an alternative celebration of Seder.
About 40 people attended the event, all were Jews (Zionists and anti-Zionists) except myself and another Palestinian.

A few days after the event, I received the attached letter, sent to my home address, using my maiden name.

Having lost my beloved husband only four months prior to the incident (20/12/2005), and living alone with my children, I was concerned because of the threatening tone of the letter and because it came from a Zionist who apparently knew my address, so I went to the police.

The police took the matter seriously, because of the threat and racist nature of the letter, and decided to interview the entire group of people who attended the Seder event, as it is evident that the author of the letter was one of the guests.

The Jewish anti-Zionist group who invited me were mortified with the prospect of their guests being “offended” if interviewed by the police, they asked the police NOT to interview their guests and to leave it to them to ​”investigate​”​ and try to find out who is the person who threatened me and my kids.

Months passed by, during which they managed to put the police investigation on hold, while they kept evading, postponing and claiming they couldn’t find out who send the letter, until eventually, I gave up and dropped the case.

Many ​years later, while narrating the events to a friend of mine, I almost choked on my own words, as I realised the seriousness of what happened.

Evidently, this incident made it clear to me that the so called Jewish “friends” were more concerned about “offending” their Jewish guests than the serious risks to my life and my children’s lives!

This type of conflict of interest and disloyalty within the movement is what we have to deal with.

SECOND CASE

In January last years, I wrote an article in which I suggested a bloodless peaceful solution, offering world Jewry (specially those who oppose the Jewish state), a way with the potential of solving the century-old injustice and end it peacefully, once and for all, without a drop of blood.

The proposed solution could have delivered Jewish-Zionists out of the mess they have created, and would have paved a way in which Jewish anti-Zionist supporters would have the golden opportunity to prove their loyalty to Palestinian cause.

They had the chance to prove their mantra, that world Jewry cannot be blamed for “Israel” or its crimes.

They had the chance to demonstrate through practical and meaningful ways their willingness to challenge their communities and put their weight against what is still a majority of Zionist Jews to create a paradigm shifts, by creating a NEW JEWISH FUND to raise the billions necessary to, at first buy the stolen and confiscated Palestinian property, and secondly transfer it back to the rightful Palestinian owners.

Redemption: A Challenge to World Jewry

In this article, I offer a realistic non-violent solution, which has the potential to set everyone free, and to solve the century-old crime of rape of Palestine.
* Palestinians get their land back;
* Anti–Zionist Jews get to prove to the world their claim that most Jews are not Zionists, thus innocent of the crimes of “Israel”, and that anti-Zionists are the “true representatives” of world Jewry, and that they mean business and their loyalty is indeed with the oppressed;
and
* World Jewry gets redemption for decades of their support to ruthless crimes.

It’s is a solution which can right the wrong, restore justice, brings peace, compensate the wronged, and even enrich the Jewish-Zionist settlers.

My solution invites Jewish progressives to fund-raise from their own communities in order to buy back what their brethren have initially stolen, and currently occupy. Thus, this solution offers a permanent remedy for healing of the holy land and its people, once and for all.

I sent the article to almost all anti-Zionists outlets and organizations, which I know of, however, unsurprisingly, my suggestion fell on deaf ears… ZERO response was their answer, not even acknowledgment.

Except for “Jews for Justice for Palestinians”, who responded by accusing me of  being “outrageously racist”

The response of “Jews for Justice for Palestinians” has caused activist Elizabeth Morley to remove her name as a signatory from JFJFP list, as explained in the following exchange of emails (which, with sincere apology to Elizabeth Morley, I feel obliged to reveal because of the nature of topic and its influence on the Palestinian struggle):

THIRD CASE
In order to understand the role of Jewish only organization ​like for example “Jews for Justice for Palestinians”, enough to have a closer look at their website and their declared aims to see how conflicting their aims are with the Palestinian narrative and aspirations.

CONCLUSION

Jewish anti-Zionist supporters who join the pro-Palestinian groups in order to pacify Palestinians and to feed into the lie that “peace is possible” with an expansionist supremacist entity, and the delusion of “let us coexist” with a GENOCIDAL collective, are well advised to go to the camp of AGGRESSORS and Pacify their fellows.

If they are really sincere, they should LEAVE the Palestinians ALONE to LEAD their own struggle for Freedom and Liberation, go to the lion’s den and focus on how to DEFEAT the terrorist entity from within, (by working as eyes and ears FOR Palestinian resistance) and from outside (by sabotaging the global Jewish-Zionist network, which feeds the beast).

Rather than taking over pro-Palestinian groups and turning them into an ADL style organizations whose main objective is for fight “antisemitism” and to excommunicate those who question the primacy of Jewish suffering.

Instead of ostracizing outspoken Palestinians, and silencing their voices which echo RESISTANCE and LIBERATION, they should take the beast by its horns and and challenge their own communities inside Palestine and across the globe.

Such a role not only it would prove their sincerity, accelerate the defeat of the beast but it’s also much more dignified for the preservation of their own honesty, morality and humanity.

​They must STOP DEFENDING “Israel’s rights”​, and instead, ​try to PACIFY their own PEOPLE whether those who occupy Palestine or their Jewish-Zionist international supporters.

​They should ​LEAVE PALESTINIANS to LEAD their OWN STRUGGLE for LIBERATION​ and work on their own people.

People who care about the rape of Palestine and the plight of Palestinians, should once and for all realize that any advocacy of “israeli rights” to stay in a land they are attempting to utterly ruin, or to “coexist” with a people they are attempting to annihilate, such advocacy is betrayal of Humanity.

Once and for all, there is no coexistence with criminals of that level.

FULL LIBERATION is the only way to right the wrong of a century of Crimes Against Humanity.

Our future is NOT entangled with theirs, because they as a collective have caused the near destruction in an entire region of the world for almost a century in ever greater murderous genocidal criminality. Individually and collectively, Jewish “Israelis” are accountable for past and ongoing Crimes Against Humanity. Legally and Historically, they will have to bear the consequences. The “golden times” of warmongering, land theft and assassination of children will soon be over.

We need ACTION that brings CHANGE not just collecting donations or symbolic gestures which makes one feel good, while leaving us stagnating, like hamsters running till exhaustion in a treadmill only to stay where we are.

It is exactly like coming to help building a demolished house only for it to be re-demolished again and again and again and again; useless “action” of alleged “resistance” only to deplete our time, energy and resources and achieve NOTHING on the ground but the illusion of “victory”.

If they really want to help then be our guest, but go all the way and do the REAL STUFF to bring CHANGE.

The REAL STUFF is NOT a “Kum ba yah” song, oh let’s hug each other and lecture about “coexistence”, then miraculously fantasise that their bullets would molest our babies less aggressively, bombs would fall softer on our heads or our decades of excruciating pain of exile would suddenly taste sweeter.

We do NOT need to be “taught” how to be “humanists” with those who are tearing our bodies to pieces, poisoning our food and water, murdering our babies as we speak!

What we need is REAL ACTION of goodwill and sincerity that proves to us that they are genuinely sorry for what their fellows have done and willing to put things right, at whatever cost, i.e:

a) Total disengagement with the Zionist entity. Stop promoting the so called their “legitimate claims” and “rights of security”. Abandon the idea that such terrorist entity has any legal or “legitimate claims” or “rights”, and think of ways to stop the continuous illegitimate illegal flood of Jewish invaders who continue to pour into occupied Palestine.

b) Work within the International Legal system to help RETURN all STOLEN LAND and PROPERTY, help fund REPARATION, RESTORATION and COMPENSATION process and think of legal ways to facilitate the RETURN of ALL refugees.

c) Participate, collect information and help facilitate Law-suites against “Israeli” criminals whether soldiers, settlers or international collaborators, promoters and financiers.

d) Work within their own Jewish communities world wide to bring change in their SUPREMACIST attitude and criminal behaviour (for financial and moral support of criminals)

e) Work through legal avenues to REVOKE ISRAEL’S UN MEMBERSHIP. The racist genocidal occupation entity, which was in breach of UN Charters, which has violated and defied more UN resolutions and charter principles than any other. This illegitimate entity has no moral or legal ground whatsoever to be a member of the UN. Its membership is a disgrace on the face of humanity and a mockery of International Law. Israel’s UN membership should have never happened in the first place.

f) A little humility would go a long way: sit in the back seat when it comes to LEADERSHIP of pro-Palestinian organizations, listen to and echo the voices of Palestinians but do NOT hijack it, do NOT replace it with your own. LEAVE Palestinians ALONE to devise their OWN ASPIRATIONS, GOALS, VISION and STRATEGIES.

Our ultimate aim to Full Liberation of Palestine remains stronger than ever, and as it were this aim is aligned with utmost foundational aspects of International Law. Yet infiltrators, sayanim and other, are working day and night to delete LIBERATION from the consciousness of Palestinians and their supporters, by implanting their “doves” at the heart of our Palestinian activist movement, inside and outside of Palestine.

To contribute to the liberation of the discourse at first, our supporters may wish to expose the dirty trick consisting of limiting the choice to a false dichotomy, “one state, two state”. Palestinians and our supporters may wish to bring back on the table the concept of Full Liberation, as the only fair solution, and what is more the only long term feasible solution. We may want to be determined and forceful, by voicing Liberation amidst all circles of supporters, hammering it until it becomes again natural and evident, the way it is in reality.

Once supporters and public opinion start to listen to the Palestinians and their acute grievances due to a slow genocide committed against them, once supporters absorb the humanitarian concept of Liberation of Palestine, as a fair and necessary step to Peace and Prosperity in the Middle East and beyond, only then can Palestinians regain their faith in this western humanity who has abandoned and betrayed them.

Only then can Palestinians cease to succumb to the murdering machine aiming at pacifying them into obedient slaves.

Only then will solidarity groups cease to fall for the poisonous lies brought to them by the Hasbara agents who talk “peace” while their fellows plan more theft and more murder.

Reviving the concept of Liberation must be accompanied with all types of ​support possible, including education, spreading awareness, call for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions, humanitarian aid, financial support, and above all, defending the right of Palestinians to DEFEND themselves and explaining to supporters and others that Resistance under such chronic murderous and brutal occupation is not only a legitimate right, but also a duty.

The first step of LIBERATION of Palestine starts by LIBERATING the DISCOURSE which begins with giving Palestinians a platform and LISTENING to their narrative.

The post Liberating the Discourse: Why Palestine Solidarity™ Is as Colonized as the Land Itself appeared first on Insight Media.

Abe went with sincere intentions, according to Imam Sayed Ali Khamenei, the leader of the Islamic Revolution. However, it was obvious that Abe had been pressured by America to deliver a message to Imam Khamenei, who refused to negotiate with America’s terrorist government.

Not only did America and “Israel” create ISIS, they have been hostile towards the world for at least the past 100 years and have not been sincere in recognizing the rights, sovereignty, nor self-determination of other nations. This is a situation not unique to Trump and Netanyahu, but has been the status quo since at least Woodrow Wilson, who was coerced by Zionist extremists like Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis to enter World War 1. Little did Wilson know that this was a tit-for-tat for the Zionists of Britain who promised the UK that America would enter the war if they promise Jews a homeland on top of Palestine.

The only president to stand up to this status quo was John F. Kennedy. His behind-the-scenes war against “Israel’s” attempt to develop nuclear weapons led to Ben Gurion’s resignation. For this defiance of global Zionism, his brains were blown out in public view. Afterwards, global Zionism has had a firm grip on American politics, culture, media, and finance. Together, global Zionism and Western imperialism have been the cause of most of the world’s misery, poverty, wars, death, and environmental pollution.

Japan is no stranger to such death, destruction, and hostility from the hands of America and international Zionists.

Since the American empire forcibly opened Japan’s borders to the outside world after hundreds of years of quasi-isolationism, the U.S. has imposed lopsided, unfair treaties on Japan. As usual, the U.S. broke most of those treaties. The Islamic Republic of Iran has experienced for 40 years what most of the world experienced for more than 100 years because it refuses to be a colony.

The Islamic Republic knows its own history and world history, which fuels its basira (deep insight) that gives it the logical and moral justification for not trusting the U.S. and “Israel.” Japan has the history, but due to America keeping Japan under its thumb, both politically and culturally since the end of WW2, even if its leaders wanted to have some form of independence from the two-faced American empire, they have very little room to do so and would have to resort to long-term smart diplomatic chess moves in order to slowly gain back their full sovereignty.

The book Japan Bites Back is a compilation of important yet underrated historical documents from Japan’s National Diet Library edited by former Press TV correspondent Joshua Blakeney. The documents he gathered show a different side to the official narrative of WW2.

Contrary to the pro-Zionist, pro-imperialist version of history, Japan wasn’t a “fascist empire” who “genocided” other Asian nations. Rather, they were a pan-Asianist liberationist force helping other Asian nations find independence and self-determination, removing the shackles of both Western imperialism and Soviet Bolshevism from East Asia. This is not to paint Japan as a utopia or free of blemishes, but hardly the “genocidal fascists” caricature shoved down our throats from preschool and up.

Many of the documents from Japan’s NDL demonstrate the historical context of Pearl Harbor. The narrative we are force fed is that Japanese people were a bunch of Emperor-worshiping psychopaths who attacked America for no good reason at all. Rather, it was the American regime who is the arrogant sociopath dominating the world, which put Japan in the position to retaliate.

Those who are interested in seeing America’s historical hostility to Japan can read Blakeney’s book as well as observe history. However, this article will focus on what is more generally glossed over: the antagonism of International Zionism towards Japan.

The introduction to the book was written by Mr. Blakeney himself and noted that many of the individuals who were fomenting hostilities against Japan — especially as its resistance to Western colonialism and Soviet Bolshevism increased and such a liberationist ideology was embraced by top Japanese officials and generals — were Jewish Communists (who were supportive of the Zionist ideology).

Blakeney states that Japan’s rapid development and regional influence threatened the British, Dutch, and American empires who were engaging in oppressive neo-colonial activities in East Asia. For example, America had taken the Philippines in 1898.

Additionally, Japan posed a threat to the newly emerging Communist superpowers. Japan’s stance against Western imperialism angered many international Jews who tilted towards the capitalist spectrum, but Japan’s anti-Marxist stance also angered many influential Jews who were active in the Communist side of the spectrum, especially due to the Soviet Union providing a shield to Jewish supremacists and Zionists due to laws against legitimate criticism of Jewish racial supremacism and hostility towards Jesus Christ. Both the Christians and Muslims of Russia (with the support of Russia’s Tsar) greatly curtailed the ability of Jewish supremacists to engage in practices such as usury and Christ-hatred (the Jewish Talmud in Gittin 57a states that Jesus is in hell in boiling excrement – you can buy the Rabbi Steinsaltz Hebrew-English translation on Amazon to verify that this is not a fake quote). All of these policies to curtail Jewish anti-gentile racism were reversed by Vladimir Lenin after the Romanov family was ritualistically murdered by Trotsky and his band of Zionist Bolshevik terrorists.

“Indeed the pioneers of anti-Japanese propaganda in this epoch were often Jews, the most prominent of whom was Wilfrid Fleisher,” wrote Blakeney in Japan Bites Back. Fleisher worked for his father’s news outlet, The Japanese Advertiser, where he pushed an editorial line in favor of Chiang Kai-shek of China and against any kind of regional self-determination in East Asia. The Japanese government shut down this vile and racist propaganda outlet in 1940 and even arrested or deported many staff members.

Fleisher weaseled his way to the U.S. to continue his anti-Japanese propaganda.

Morris Cohen worked as Kai-shek’s liaison officer to foreign consulates during the same time period. South Africa’s Sunday Express once referred to Cohen as “the guiding genius behind the warlords of China.”

Harold Isaacs was a Communist skilled in the art of propaganda, who used his abilities to assist anti-Japanese forces in the quest to Bolshevize East Asia. He wrote a book The Tragedy of the Chinese Revolution, which was promoted heavily by Lev Bronstein, who is more commonly referred to as Leon Trotsky. Trotsky was a Christ-hating racial supremacist who targeted Christians and Muslims in Russia using the full weight of the iron fist of Soviet Communism.

Trotsky’s comrade Adolph Joffe helped to form the Red Section of the Kuomintang and even became a political advisor to Kai-shek.

The Chinese Red Army operated under the advice of several Zionist Jewish Communists. In the political sector, Ludwik Rajchman and R. Haas had political sway in the Nanking Chamber of Commerce and were removed from power when Japan invaded Nanking in 1937. The book What Really Happened in Nanking? by Tanaka Masaaki presents primary sources to challenge the official narrative of what happened. It only makes sense that Jewish supremacists would fabricate a calumny against Japan in revenge for removing them from political power in Nanking.

The sad irony of Jewish supremacists pretending to be a friend of the Chinese people is that much of China’s plight prior to the revolution was due to Jewish supremacists. The Mizrahi Jewish Sassoun family from Iraq was running opium into China, which destroyed Chinese society by turning honest, productive people into destructive addicts.

Harry Dexter White was a prominent Jewish racial supremacist and Communist who worked in the US Treasury. He was close with Henry Morgenthau (re: Morgenthau Plan) and helped to engineer many of America’s economic sanctions against Japan. Blakeney notes that “Ralph Townsend, a U.S.-based journalist who was imprisoned for his pro-Japanese thoughts (on the personal order of President Franklin D. Roosevelt), noted how within foreign policy circles [existed] ‘Liberalist Jewish writers, who are rather numerous … favor Russia.”

We see this relationship of Zionist Jewish racial supremacists egging on power hungry American gentile politicians and other powerful people into wars in our modern day. International Zionism and the Anglo-American empire are partners in crime when it comes to inflicting misery on innocent people around the globe.

Bush’s cabinet was almost entirely filled with Zionist Jewish neoconservatives who almost all were part of this nefarious think tank called the Project for the New American Century, co-founded by Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan. Wolfowitz, Perle, Kagan, Libby, Feith, Zakheim, Abrams, Chertoff, Frum, etc. are just some of the criminals who helped to murder nearly 2 million people in the Iraq War. They all pushed America into war with Iraq in the same way these Communist Jewish supremacists pushed America to war with Japan. It is no coincidence that neoconservativism was created by former Trotskyites, namely its godfather Irving Kristol.

The same neocons who spearheaded the false flag war on Islam (with their main target being the Islamic Republic of Iran) are literally cut from the same cloth as the Trotskyites who spearheaded the push for war with Japan, since the founding fathers of neoconservatism were previously Trotskyites.

As mentioned before, there were many non-Jewish elements pushing for war with Japan. However, most of these warmongers were also working side-by-side with anti-gentile bigots.

Not to mention that the Jewish-Zionist Rothschild banking dynasty controlled the national treasures of most of the European countries that were at war with Japan. They do not want to see independent nations emerge from among colonized regions. The fact that Japan assisted Asian nations in achieving independence was a big no-no for the bankers.

Japan was defeated by the genocidal, heartless, and Satanic invention known as the nuclear bomb, the godfathers of such technology have the last names of Oppenheimer, Teller, Cohen, and Einstein.

Just by this history alone, it is easy to see just how hostile International Zionism has been towards Japan. International Zionism only “respects” those who are subservient to its will. Those who are independent are thus dubbed as “extremists,” “fascists,” “antisemites,” “terrorists,” et al.

Aside from Japan wanting independence, on the most basic level Jewish supremacists are racist and bigoted against all gentiles (non-Jews, or the derogatory term they use “goyim”), no matter if the gentile nation/group in question is black, white, brown, etc.

“Only Jews are human. Non-Jews are not human.” – Babylonian Jewish Talmud, Bava Metzia 114b

Even the “goyim” who are subservient to them, they still do not respect. Like Malcolm X’s parable of the House Negro and the Field Negro, the House Negro is still a slave and no matter how much he loves his master, his master does not love him back and still views him as less than dirt.

All self-respecting peoples around the world know that oppressive forces will only “respect” them once they abandon their self-respect and independence.

That is why today we see Jewish supremacists and their Shabbos Goyim clientele — whether they be right-wing Washington D.C. think tank neoconservatives or left-wing Trotskyite SJW hipsters — feign respect for Japan, but the moment any Japanese seeks to reaffirm their own sovereignty, independence, and self-determination, automatically they are labeled as a “fascist” and “Hitler lover.”

Such as is the case with this skinny-jeans-wearing, soy-milk-binging, gentrified-neighborhood-living, whiney SJW white hipster (who espouses Trotskyite ideology) kvetching about how Japanese self-determination equals “fascism” and “Hitler.” Such is the discourse in 2019: if you disagree with someone, simply compare them to Hitler to shut down the argument.

While he kvetches about how Japanese nationalists gloss over alleged Korean comfort women and alleged massacres at Nanking, he intentionally glosses over the real and actual nuclear annihilation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thereby passively glorifying it as necessary to defeat “fascism,” like an atomic punch in the face from a purple-haired anarcho-Trotskyite antifa activist from Portland, Oregon. Vox was founded by Jewish supremacist Ezra Klein. In the 1930s, it was Wilfrid Fleisher making propaganda to stifle Japan’s self-determination. In 2019, it is Ezra Klein and his army of soy milk drinking, beta male (unless they don’t want their gender to be assumed) hipsters on Vox trying to prevent Japan from regaining its dignity. Imagine the arrogance of an American coming to Japan and telling them they can’t have self-determination, and if they do then they’re “literally Hitler.”

They’ll respect all the superficial aspects of Japanese culture, or any “goyim” culture for that matter. Chopsticks, ramen, sushi, onsen, anime, and even destructive behaviors like pornography and alcohol — basically things that revolve around the stomach and private parts. On a side note, alcohol use in Japan is not wild or rowdy like other countries and cultures, but since both International Zionists and Anglo-American imperialists engage in cultural imperialism in Japan, there may certainly be an outside push to make Japan’s alcohol culture much more vile and destructive like most of the world is. When it comes to pornography, well we know who dominates in that industry (they admit it themselves). Japan has many traditional values — such as faith (Shintoism, Buddhism, and to a lesser extent Christianity and Islam), family, respect, modesty, and morality — which the Zio-imperialists seek to obliterate with secular nihilism. This is not only true in Japan, but throughout the world where we see Jewish supremacists pushing secular liberal internationalism on entire nations with the goal of destroying the God-centric family unit.

When it comes to actually respecting Japanese, which includes respecting their self-determination and their nation’s dignity, these International Zionists and Western gentile imperialists have zero respect. That is when their true colors are shown.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has stood for its political, social, and, most important of all, spiritual/religious independence and has helped to export such aspirations of self-determination and dignity to nations in the region (without forcing said nations to follow any certain religion!). These same International Zionists and Western gentile imperialists will “respect” Persians when it comes to carpets and kabob, but when it comes to actually respecting Iran, their true colors are shown.

Japan and Iran have a lot in common in this respect, and that is why Japan and Prime Minster Abe should seek a growing friendship with the Islamic Republic, based on genuine diplomacy as well as the need to strengthen each other’s independence from Global Arrogance.

Mr. Abe was once a part of a historical revisionist research group that rightfully sought to use facts and primary sources to reverse the Zionist and American distortions of their history. When Mr. Abe visited the contentious Yasukuni Shrine, which commemorates those who defended Japan from American onslaught in World War 2, it was none other than Jewish supremacist Amitai Etzioni who said “Unlike Japan, [Germany] faced their past, came to terms with it and learned from it. Japan should do the same.” This is a soft way of saying that any Japanese who has an ounce of self-respect and dignity is automatically “Hitler.”

Due to his background in working to reclaim Japan’s historical image from falsehoods and unfair distortions, Mr. Abe should be at least somewhat aware of Japan’s friendship with the East Asian Islamic world, such as Indonesia and Malaysia.

This alliance is yet another wrecking ball into the narrative of Japan being “fascist,” and establishes Japan as a pan-Asianist liberation force who exported self-determination across East Asia.

In Indonesia, the Japanese Imperial Army supported Muslim revolutionary leader Ahmad Sukarno against the Dutch occupation. Sukarno would eventually become Indonesia’s first president. One of the militant groups of the Indonesian National Revolution fighting against the Dutch was actually named Hizbullah! The Indonesian Hizbullah was founded by Muslim politician Sekarmadji Maridjan Kartosoewirjo in 1942 and received support from the Japanese Imperial Army. While the modern Japanese state erroneously labels Lebanese Hizbullah as a “terrorist” organization (perhaps due to Western pressure), Mr. Abe should know Japan’s history with Indonesia’s Hizbullah. While the Indonesian Hizbullah eventually went off course and fought against the newly independent Indonesian republic, the Lebanese Hizbullah has proved itself to be a good actor in the region and is clear from all charges of being a “terrorist” organization. It was Lebanese Hizbullah, along with Iran, Syria, Iraq, and Russia that defeated ISIS.

Islamically speaking, Muslims do not have a problem with polytheist religions or governments so long as they are not hostile towards Muslims. We may disagree with their theology, but if they’re not fighting against us nor oppressing us, we respect them as human beings and do not interfere with their right to practice their beliefs. The Qur’an’s verses about fighting polytheists are about those who hold the reigns of political power and use it to actively oppress and fight against the believers. Even then, it is only to engage in self-defense and resistance against the oppressive powers, not to target innocent civilians wantonly.

Old Japan’s case is quite the opposite of hostility! Despite their polytheistic Shinto religion, they helped Muslims to overthrow the colonialist occupations of oppressive Western imperialist regimes that are run by Satanic polytheistic freemasons who pretend to be “Christians” (whose governments are financed by Jewish supremacist central bankers).

Hopefully Mr. Abe’s awareness of this history, even if a rudimentary awareness, can lead to him re-establishing ties to the Islamic world, especially the good actors of the region who fight against terrorism, namely the Islamic Republic of Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine.

Aside from the hipster millennial propaganda videos of Vox, International Zionism actually poses a much more serious threat to Japan, and not only to its independence, but to its safety and security as well.

In January 2019, two “Israelis” were arrested by Japanese authorities for the “biggest gold smuggling operation in [Japan’s] history,” according to the Times of “Israel.” Like parasites, “Israelis” do not respect their host countries well-being.

Aside from Japan’s financial security, “Israel” poses a threat to Japan’s physical safety. Not-so-coincidentally, at the exact same time that Mr. Abe was meeting with Imam Khamenei, two oil tankers which were carrying cargo to Japan were allegedly attacked in the Gulf of Oman. This is clearly a false flag — the operator of the ship bravely contradicted the American ZOG’s official story. Mossad seems to be getting amateurish with their false flags, as the timing of the incident makes it obvious. However painfully obvious that these attacks are suspicious enough to make it a false flag, the American ZOG was quick to blame Iran as the most likely culprit. How arrogant considering America’s role in creating ISIS by arming/funding al-Qaeda-allied rebels in Syria, to which “Israel” has openly admitted supporting such terrorist “rebels.”

It is worth noting that the ships and their crews were rescued by Iranians.

If the Mossad is willing to go to such desperate lengths to provoke war and tensions against Iran, then Japanese intelligence should be keeping a watchful eye on all “Israelis” who are in their country, legally or illegally.

With the Olympics and Special Olympics coming up in 2020, it is very possible that Mossad could be planning a false flag attack on the Olympic stadiums and/or athletes in order to falsely blame it on Iran or on Palestinian/Lebanese resistance groups. Hundreds or even thousands of lives could be at risk and it is very important that if — GOD FORBID — anything were to happen, justice is achieved and the wrong people/nations are not blamed for the crimes of “Israel’s” clandestine intelligence operations.

Iran is clearly against terrorism and is not against the American people, but rather the malicious American government that is run by International Zionists and gentile imperialists, which doesn’t even abide by the principles of the U.S. Constitution nor Bill of Rights. Iran has no history of attacking civilians nor waging wars of aggression. Their support of resistance groups in the Middle East is just that: resistance, which is a form of self-defense, not initiatory violence and certainly not “terrorism.”

Hopefully Mr. Abe’s visit to Iran — that is, the part of which was genuine and not the aspects which were coaxed by America — is the beginning of Japan’s slow return to self-determination and independence.

As Khamenei.ir states:

The Leader of the Revolution welcomed the Japanese Prime Minister’s suggestion of expanding relations between Japan and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and reminded his audience: Japan is an important country in Asia, and if they are willing to expand relations with Iran, they should prove their sincere willingness– just as some important countries have shown their interest.

Referring to the forty years of hostility that the U.S. has shown to the Iranian nation and the continuation of the hostility, the Supreme Leader maintained: We believe that our problems will not be solved by negotiating with the U.S., and no free nation would ever accept negotiations under pressure.

Ayatollah Khamenei then responded to remarks by the Japanese Prime Minister on how the Americans have always wanted to impose their own beliefs and views on other nations and stated: It is good that you acknowledge this fact, and you should also know that the Americans will observe no limits in imposing their views.

Given that in both past and present, Japan and Iran are both victims of Western imperialism and International Zionism, they can work together to establish a multi-polar world free of double standards, hypocrisy, and bullying. Iran’s stance against Wahabbi terrorism can help to inform Japan about extremist threats within its island borders. Islamic Iran’s reverence for the traditional family unit can help Japan rediscover its traditional roots and remedy the issue of a declining population rate. Japan’s economic self-reliance can help the Islamic Republic achieve Imam Khamenei’s vision of the “economy of resistance,” which seeks to make Iran self-reliant instead of dependent on imports from foreign powers.

This friendship has many potentials. In the past, Japan once said no to Western imperialism and no to Eastern Soviet Bolshevism; yes to independence and self-determination for East Asian peoples. In 1979, Iran said the same thing: no to the West (capitalism), no to the East (Communism), just an Islamic Republic.

Islamic Iran has not imposed Islamic governance on other nations. Rather, like Old Japan, it has exported self-determination and independence for other nations. It is thanks to Iran that Aramaic-speaking Christians in Maalula, Syria, can freely practice Christianity after Lebanese Hezbollah defeated ISIS and al-Nusra.

These two nations have a lot in common and can contribute to a brighter future for all of humanity. Contrary to what the media says about Japan and Iran, both nations stand for peace. Despite that, both nations are subject to a disproportionate amount of lies and distortions because the warmongers and mischief makers hold the levers of power in global media and academia.

Unfortunately, the modern day Japanese Self Defense Forces have been an ally of the very country that brought Japan to its knees. The Japanese military even followed America into the illegal invasion of Iraq. The same Zionists that pushed for war against Japan in the 1940s also pushed for war against Iraq in the 2000s. The tragic irony is unmistakable here. One thing Japan must learn from Iran is to find a way to make themselves truly independent and based on a moral compass. Being servile to the United States is not honorable and not fitting to the Japanese military which was once known throughout East Asia as a liberationist force that broke the shackles of Western imperialism and Soviet Bolshevism. If Mr. Abe is truly a Japanese nationalist, then he should seek to restore Japan’s independence and self-determination in the most practical extent possible given America’s unyielding pressure over the island nation.

While Mr. Abe’s visit was limited to talks of diplomacy and strengthening economic ties, hopefully it is the beginning of a new page for Japanese-Iranian relations.

Update 11/3/2019: Remember when ISIS (a creation of the Mossad and CIA) kidnapped a few Japanese journalists (they made the mistake of going into Syria illegally, from what I understand – perhaps they would have had a different fate if they went in legally via the Syrian government’s visa process)? They were in jail for a long time. Only when Abe-san sign an aid package to Palestine, Daesh just happened to pull these people out of prison and behead them. That means that ISIS acts according to “Israeli” interests, and that “Israel” has Japanese blood on its hands.

The post International Zionism’s Historical Antagonism Towards Japan appeared first on Insight Media.

Editor’s Note: Hip-hop started as a socio-political voice of the voiceless after the combined efforts of the Zionist Anti-Defamation League, the FBI’s CoIntelPro operations, and clandestine CIA operations resulted in the assassination of Afro-American voices such as Malcolm X and Martin Luther King. Jewish supremacists, who hate black people based on the Talmud’s exegesis of the Curse of Ham found in the Old Testament (fake, man-altered “Torah”), did not want Afro-Americans to use art as a means of communicating messages. The Jewish-Zionist dominated showbusiness wants to use art as a means of keeping people asleep by pushing messages of sex, drug use, and other vices, because people who are glued to their carnal, material desires such as food and sex are very easy to control. Parasites like “Israeli”-American media moguls Lyor Cohen and Jerry Heller stepped in to neutralize groups like Public Enemy and replace them with Jay-Z and NWA. Read this article about just how deep the “Israeli” culture war against positive art goes and how they intentionally push out “art” that promotes nothing but filth, degeneracy, and addiction to sin.

Let me give credit from the jump to Steve Boursiquot (aka Awthentic), a dope rapper from the DMV, for inspiring this write up. Initially, I had other topics in mind to write about, but a cursory scroll down my timeline on Facebook on the way to town drew my attention to the status that Steve posted. He noted that people are actually quoting Jay Z as if he is some sort of profound thinker. He is right, all over Facebook, one Jay Z sycophant after another is ranting about his new album. So now is good as time as any to deconstruct this rapping simpleton.

I’m not going to publicize Jay Z’s two bit CD he dropped last week by name, but I will let you know he chose the title of his album to say that he too is a prophet like Jesus. Look up John 4:44 in the bible and read what it says, this imbecile is saying that he is being hated on because he is rap’s messiah. Judas is more like it, this ignoramus has been a thorn on the side of hip hop since the day he decided to sell his soul and named his record label after the devil in flesh David Rockefeller.

Since Jay Z opened the door with the title he chose, let me knock that door down and expose Jay Z’s for the fraud and whore that he is. You see, old money traces its roots back to the biblical days; the battle of good and evil has been waged since the time Cain killed Abel. Over each successive generation, the debauched have been able to invert the souls of many by giving them money and promising them fame and riches. This is how the Pharisees were able to flip Judas from a prophet to a traitor—it was old money that crucified Yeshua. Old money has had a grip on this world for a long time, every prophet since they nailed Yeshua to a cross has been murdered by the cunning ways of the powerful. In modern time, flawed men who became messengers of love were likewise eradicated by old money; Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, to name two of many, were blown apart at the behest of the moneyed gentry. Read Confluence of Martin and Malcolm (hyperlinked) to find out the ways the powerful kill the messengers and then blame lone gun men to escape judgement.

The Rockefellers are part of this old money I’m referring to, their money goes back generations to the day of John D. Rockefeller and beyond. John D. Rockefeller was a pugnacious scoundrel who ushered in the age of the crony capitalism by kneecapping his competition and paying his workers slave wages while pitting them in the most atrocious of working conditions. The Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Mellons, and Morgans of this world, these people are celebrated as gods when they are really Luciferian pricks who earned their vast fortunes by oppressing the masses and stealing the wealth of nations. The over-sized monster our Federal government has become we can give thanks to these soulless plutocrats; they unleashed their money in order to hijack our government and turned DC into the locus of global injustice.

So our boy Jay—the jibagoo on stage who raps about nothing—is paying homage to these cancerous people when he throws up that demonic pyramid as he bows to the alter of illuminated a**holes. Tupac refused to give his hand to these malignant maggots and actually came out with an album titled Killuminati to stand against the very people that Jay Z (Klandestine Korporate Klan) gets on bent knees to worship. For his troubles, Pac got assassinated (From Afeni 2 Pac) while Jay Z became the wealthiest rapper/Uncle Tom in the history of coonery. We equate money and wealth with well-being and good character when almost 100% of the time, those who have excess money and wealth have zero character and negative wellness about them.

What is there to celebrate about Sean Carter anyway? Is being “black” and wealthy enough to land one as a model of moral rectitude? This man has done nothing but promote corporatism, consumerism and commercialism for more than two decades. The only people who should be praising him are alcohol companies and expensive watch makers. This man has turned hip hop into a billboard of Wall Street and elevated materialism as a supreme virtue. Did he use his mic and platform to speak against systematic poverty that is killing hope in our community? Did he use his fame to speak about communal reinvestment? Did he leverage his talent to stand up for anything beyond his narcissism? No need to Google, this vacuous step and fetch it corporate minstrel show did nothing but chase dollars while peddling garbage to the masses.

Jigaboo Jay got paid a king’s ransom for a purpose. Hip hop was once a music of defiance that traces its roots to the days of drums that signaled rebellion, jazz that symbolized resilience and blues which turned sorrow into arts. Music has been what kept the people who were once stolen from the continent of Ethiopia (map evidence) from being undone by systematic brutality and unimaginable inhumanity. Hip hop was the evolution of this defiance, that is until corporate hyenas unleashed their checks and their old blood money to buy up rappers and emcees in order to turn our music against us. Jay Z is at the forefront of these lyrical Judases; they made fortunes by whispering hatred, violence, misogyny and messages of nothingness into the ears of our children.

I’m not being pious here nor am I preaching that rap has to be sanitized and can’t talk about the totality of our experiences. To pretend that violence and slinging dope does not take place or to not mention it in music is putting heads in sands of indifference. But there is a vast difference between conveying struggles and glorifying the very things that make the masses struggle. Jay Z and his misbegotten lot have weaponized hip hop and daily commit rhetorical genocides on our children. The same way that “African” Judases sold their brothers and sisters into slavery for the sake of money and weapons, Jay Z and his ilk do the same now as they sell us into hopelessness for the sake of gaining millions.

Nah I will have nothing to do with Jay Z, I will listen to rappers who have not sold their souls for the sake of millions and support independent artists like Awthentic who nurture true hip hop while Jay Z aborts it daily. Occasionally I will listen to mainstream rappers for there are the likes of Kendrick Lamar (Light of Lamar) who crank out message even as they are getting paid for their crafts. Let the sheep quote Jay Z as though he is some sort of messiah, I see him for exactly what he is. A Judas whose narcissism is only outmatched by his unending treachery. #JudasJayZ

“There is poison in the fang of the serpent, in the mouth of the fly and in the sting of a scorpion; but the wicked man is saturated with it.” ~ Chanakya

If you appreciated the message behind this write up and want to speak against the continued hijacking of our culture in order to feed the corporate agenda, share this article on social media using #JudasJayZ

I wait for a rapper to pick up the mic and drop knowledge like the Ghion Cast below instead of being a step and fetch it artist of old money jackals. 

Check out Awthentic (Steve Boursiquot) when you get a minute, he is a DOPE local rapper. Click HERE or the picture below to hear his music.

Rest in peace Pac, they killed you because you spoke against them, but your music continues to speak against them even in your absence. 

Communiqué 2Pac

You asked how long you will be mourned
The answer is for an eternity
A soul conflicted yet confident
You spoke of hip hop’s possibility

The post From Judas to Jay Z: Perfidy That Pays a Lot More Than 30 Shekels appeared first on Insight Media.

Teachers have rights over their students, and a faulty educational system causes students to become jaded at the system and not respect the rights of the teachers, because the system that is beyond the teachers creates an environment that prevents true learning of the truth. Conversely, students have rights over their teachers, and if enough teachers stood up against the system, they could protect their students from being brainwashed by the system.

Imam Ali ibn Hussain, also known as as-Sajjad (the prostrated one) and Zain al-Abideen (jewel of the worshipers), was an early Islamic saint who said this about the rights of teachers and students in his Treatise on Rights:

The right of the possessor of authority (sultan) is that you know that God has made you a trial (fitna) for him. God is testing him through the authority He has given him over you. You should not expose yourself to his displeasure, for thereby you cast yourself by your own hands into destruction and become his partner in his sin when he brings evil down upon you. (#15)

The right of him who asks you for advice (mustashir) is that, if you consider that he has a correct opinion, you advise him to follow it, and if you do not consider it so, you direct him to someone who does consider it so. (#40)

As someone who grew up in the secular liberal educational institutions in America, I can say with absolute certainty that nearly everything that I was ever told was a lie. No one ever told me the truth about reality, existence, the spiritual dimensions, the Creator of All Things (Allah), Islam, Imam Hussain/Ashura, ethics, morals, family life, and socio-political history. All those, I had to find out by myself after I graduated. Things like Bilderberg, 9/11 truth, the Federal Reserve, the millions of innocents killed by the fraudulent War on Terror, the criminality of the Zionist entity, or even simple things like how to truly honor the rights of women were never taught. We were only taught lies approved by the world’s biggest terrorist organizations: “Israel” and America.

Not only were we taught lies about socio-political and spiritual/religious history, when it comes to straight academics (math, science, literacy, etc.) America is ranked among the worst educational systems in the world. Not only do we get lied to about history, they can barely teach us to read, write, add numbers together, and understand basic scientific understandings about the laws of the universe that Allah created.

Even worse, when we get into college/university, they give us two choices ideologically: neoliberal capitalism or pseudo-“revolutionary” Marxism/Trotskyism/anarcho-socialism. As the late, great Dr. Ali Shariati once declared, Marxism and capitalism are two sides of the same coin. So when you want to rebel against the prevailing world order, universities in the West give you a carefully controlled “liberationist” ideology that does not affect the system in the slightest, but makes you feel like you are making a difference. Instead of focusing on the usury of the Federal Reserve, NATO, global Zionism, corporatism, and more, people think they are “rebelling” by spray painting their hair purple, becoming a lesbian, and shouting “mansplaining” at anyone who disagrees with them. You can thank Trotsky along with the Frankfurt School for such poison being taught to our precious youth. People think they are “woke” by ascribing to the “liberal enlightened” branch of Zio-imperialism. Don’t believe me? Go check out what British imperialists said about religious Muslims & Christians when they were occupying the Middle East – they said secularism was the best way to subdue the masses. It’s not hard to comprehend: when people are solely focused on chasing their base, carnal desires (i.e. food and sex), then they are easy to manipulate and control, and since they love the life of this world and think not of the hereafter, they will easily sell their soul for the sake of comfortability and favor by their new imperial masters.

Not only that, people are taught that they are too good for God, and rather than having their lives be guided by Supreme Celestial Wisdom that was revealed to the holy prophets, they should instead follow their own arrogant whims and desires based on what their limited minds can come up with. Is it any wonder that the CIA employed MIT scholar Timothy Leary to spearhead their MK Ultra program which combined psychedelic drugs with Aleister Crowley’s Satanic philosophy of moral relativism, poisoning the minds of an entire generation, leading to the moral decay we see in society today. Meanwhile, men of God like Malcolm X only get a fraction of the attention, but luckily even with the relatively small amount of time he got to speak at the podium, Martyr Malcolm X gave us gems like his Oxford University speech.

At best, Western universities give us “rebellious” academics like Noam Chomsky, a notorious liberal Zionist who claims to support Palestine yet slanders the resistance axis that is best poised to actually liberate Palestine. Looks like someone doesn’t want to see their favorite Marxist kibbutz in “Israel” given back to its rightful Palestinian owners, isn’t that right Mr. Chomsky?

Part of the problem is that we believe what criminals tell us about world history without looking at the original sources ourselves. There’s nothing wrong about learning things from second and third hand sources, although checking the original sources is always important. But when criminals are the second/third hand sources, then it is the fox guarding the henhouse and our brains get filled with lies. Had I not gone in and examined Islam for myself, I would have never become Muslim. I learned to apply that same approach across the board.

However, there are two ways to face this dilemma of mass disinformation on the general public at the hands of neoliberal Western education, especially universities and their peddling of controlled opposition ideologies like Marxism: like cowardly, spineless perpetually oppressed victims, or like honorable, upright human beings who face adversity and challenges with courage and dignity.

Hopefully you chose the latter, because that’s what we all should do. Undoing all the damage that all the Zionist hasbara and secular liberal Anglo-American imperialist brainwashing takes patience. It doesn’t all happen at once. It is a spiritual experience as much as it is a stimulation of our logic and intellect, because, especially for those who live in the West and have been lied to (but also those in the East), it allows us to see what is really going on in the world, the monsters that run it, and the millions of innocent lives lost at the altar of their lust, greed, and arrogance.

To be able to learn the truth, we need the access to the right books. Visual mediums like videos are helpful, but books are a treasure that are unfortunately thrown to the wayside in exchange for slavery to the screen, which has harmed our social skills and our attention spans.

Although this book list is far from being complete, it is a great starting point to kick off your journey of finding the truth – or to use more colloquial terms, redpilled. These are the books that sit on my bookshelf and they contain truth that the neoliberal Western universities will not teach you.

Disclaimer: The views of any particular author are not necessarily my own views. Even if I may totally disagree with some of the authors (i.e. Jewish authors that openly brag about their control of Hollywood, using Hollywood to promote moral decay, hatred of Jesus, supporting the usurping Zionist entity, etc.) it is still necessary to read their books to hear it in their own words, rather than reading second or third hand sources.

You can find them on Amazon or Abebooks. If not, just search the internet and it should be available at a hopefully reasonable price.

BOOKS THAT HAVE NO CLEAR AUTHOR OR THAT DON’T BELONG IN A LIST OF BOOKS IN ORDER OF AUTHOR’S LAST NAME ALPHABETICALLY

These books are ones that are, for example, divine scriptures or authorless compilations or just don’t belong in the second main list of books by alphabetical order of the author’s last name. The name of the book will be in bold and if necessary (i.e. the title doesn’t speak for itself), a brief synopsis will be given beneath each title. Also, since spirituality is a fundamental aspect of our purpose and existence in this world, I feel it is far more important to the foundation of our learning and research than the socio-political and fiction books that have authors attributed to them, which will be the second list after this one.

The Holy Qur’an

This is the final revelation given to God’s final Prophet, Muhammad (S), thus completing the revelations that came to prophets before him, such as Prophet Moses (as) and the Torah (which does not exist in its original form, the Old Testament is a forgery written by the Covenant Breaking rabbis) and Jesus (as) and the Gospel. Even if you are not a Muslim, you shouldn’t believe what is told to you about by the criminal Zionist media. You don’t have to believe in Islam, just don’t believe the falsehoods attributed to Islam.

Recommended English translator: Ali Quli Qarai (not written in unintelligible Shakesperian Olde English like other Qur’an translations)

Orthodox Study Bible

This version contains the Old and New Testaments and contains footnotes from Orthodox Christian scholars. It is also worth a read, because we get to see how much the prophets have been slandered by the pens of the Jewish rabbis in the Old Testament. By contrast, the New Testament exposes the devils who were the authors of the fake “Torah.” Any Christian who believes in Zionism or supporting the state of “Israel” should really re-read the Bible, if they have ever read it at all. The New Testament does not slander any of the holy prophets nor does it promote immorality and vice.

Nahj al-Balagha – The Peak of Eloquence: The Sermons and Sayings of Imam Ali ibn Abu Talib

The wisdom of the words of Imam Ali (as), one of the most just, fair, and wise rulers to have ever held a position of governance on earth, is something that all human beings, regardless of religion, can and should benefit from. It is titled what it is titled for a reason.

Sahifa Sajjadiya (Psalms of Islam) by Imam Ali ibn Hussain Zain al-Abideen as-Sajjad

Treatise on Rights by Imam Ali ibn Hussain Zain al-Abideen as-Sajjad

Lantern of the Path by Imam J’afar ibn Muhammad as-Sadiq

Hayat al-Qulub: Life of the Heart by Allamah Muhammad al-Majlisi

Volume 1 of this series deals with the biography of all the prophets before Muhammad (S), such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Ishmael, Issac, Jacob, Joseph, David, Solomon, Jonas, Zakariah, Jesus, and more, peace be upon all of them. Volume 2 deals with the life of Muhammad (pro-tip: find the non-condensed, complete version on Lulu). Volume 3 deals with the lives of the 12 Imams of Muhammad’s progeny that succeeded him in leadership.

Light Within Me by Imam Ruhollah Khomeini, Allamah Muhammad Tabatabai, and Martyr Ayatollah Murtaza Mutahhari

This book contains the teachings of three great Islamic scholars who were also deep gnostics. This book is especially important because it combats two extremes: 1) the person who thinks that religion has no spirituality and should be reduced to cold, mechanical ritual repetition, and 2) the person who thinks that spirituality should have no religion (as in structure, rituals, rules, morals, etc.) and that the spiritual wayfarer should just follow the whimsical caprices of their heart’s desires. These great Islamic scholars demolish both extremes by saying that rules are important, because we cannot be so arrogant to think we know better on how to live our lives in a way that pleases God, but that our acts of worship and rituals should not be blind, cold, mechanical, and soulless, and that gnosticism and structured religious living go hand-in-hand.

Tafsir al-Mizan by Allamah Muhammad Tabatabai

This is the gold standard modern tafsir of the Holy Qur’an written by one of the greatest Islamic scholars, known for his deep knowledge of Islamic history, jurisprudence, but also for his spiritual gnosis that gave his heart true knowledge of God.

Mifatih al-Jinan: The Keys to Paradise Translated by Ali Quli Qarai

The essential collection of authentic supplications (du’a) from the Prophet Muhammad and his progeny (Ahlul Bayt). Very beautiful and profound for enlivening and humbling the soul.

Greater Sins by Ayatollah Dastghaib Shirazi

Sahifa Fatimiyya (Psalms of Fatima) by Lady Fatima az-Zahra (sa), daughter of the Prophet Muhammad (S)

The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vols. 1-3 by the Nation of Islam Research Group

This book series has been the subject of a smear campaign based on nothing but lies and slander. These books use primarily Jewish academic, historical, and scholarly sources to expose the Jewish role in the Transatlantic Slave Trade and the Black Holocaust. No, it wasn’t motivated solely by money, but by anti-black racism found within the passages of Jewish texts. Dr. Harold Brackman, a Jewish public figure and academic, once wrote that the first religious text to interpret the Bible’s “Curse of Ham” in a negrophobic context was the Jewish Talmud (Jewish anti-black racism and involvement in slavery happened centuries before Zionism was invented). This book series is important because it exposes the disingenuous intentions of liberal Jewish involvement in the Civil Rights movement, which did more damage than good to Afro-American progress. Such wolves in sheep’s clothing are now doing the same thing to other marginalized groups, such as American Muslims, all the while doing nothing to combat their own co-religionists who run the billion-dollar Islamophobia industry. There is also an auxiliary volume of this series called Jews Selling Blacks, which is a compilation of old newspaper clippings of Jewish merchants buying and selling Africans on the slave markets of America.

The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

This book has also been subject to much controversy based on lies and slander, usually in circular arguments and fear tactics, since they cannot find the lie in the book’s contents, so they must discredit its origins. The Christian Russian empire, although it had many flaws, was one of the only entities in the world at the end of the 1800s and early 1900s to stand up firmly against Jewish power and its oppression against the human family. While much of the details of the pogroms have been exaggerated, the Tsar did prevent Jewish money lenders from exploiting the masses, but aside from that, his secret police services by the grace of God discovered a manuscript written by influential Jewish members of society that laid out a plan to oppress people around the globe, since Jewish supremacists view gentiles as racially inferior. The secret documents were then leaked to the public in Russian newspapers, later to become compiled as this book.

The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran Translated into English by Dr. Hamid Algar

The Romanov Royal Martyrs by Saint John the Forerunner Monastery

The Ascendant Qur’an: Realigning Man to the Divine Power Culture by Imam Muhammad al-‘Asi

Direct-to-English tafsir by one of the most insightful Islamic leaders in the West, Imam Muhammad al-‘Asi, the editor-in-chief of Crescent International.

BOOKS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER OF AUTHOR’S LAST NAME (INCLUDES ALL CATEGORIES SUCH AS FICTION AND NON-FICTION)

This section is for all other books. This includes both fiction and non-fiction, because while non-fiction is key for educating us about reality and truth, it would be meaningless if we turned towards art and entertainment, such as fiction books, that reinforce immorality and falsehood, which is why fiction titles are included here too.

The New Jew in Film by Professor Nathan Abrams

Professor Abrams is notorious for bragging about the Jewish role in pornography in a now-deleted article for the Jewish Quarterly, entitled “Triple-Exthnics.” In this book, he brags about Jewish control over Hollywood. He seems to have no problem with the immorality being pushed onto the masses by the so-called “chosen people.”

Gharbzadegi (Occidentosis or West-Toxification) by Jalal Al-e-Ahmad

A classic primer on mental colonialism.

The Muslim Family Guide to Successful Homeschooling by Jamila Alqarnain

The Liberal Virus by Samir Amin

Wilayat in Qur’an by Ayatollah Jawadi Amoli

From Beirut to Jerusalem: A Woman Surgeon with the Palestinians by Dr. Swee Chai Ang

How Not to Eat Pork, Or, Life Without the Pig by Shahrazad Ali

The Conference of the Birds by Farid ud-Din Attar

Classic Persian literature. Recommended by the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Sayed Ali Khamenei.

The Model of the Gnostics: Biography of Ayatollah Bahjat by Mahmoud al-Badri

Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie by Kevin Barrett

We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 by Kevin Barrett

Orlando False Flag: The Clash of Histories by Kevin Barrett

The Cousinhood: A Vivid Account of the English-Jewish Aristocracy by Chaim Bermant

This book is a historically accurate account written by a Jewish author which describes that not only was there a political alliance between the British crown/empire and powerful Jewish families like the Rothschilds, Cohens, Goldsmids, Montefiores, Samuels, and Sassoons, but there was a familial connection as well via intermarriage.

The Life of an American Jew in “Israel” by Jack Bernstein

Jack Bernstein is a lot like Benjamin Freedman. He is one of the few Jews to actually blow the whistle on global Zionism and international Jewish power in a truthful manner, unlike these various gatekeepers such as Noam Chomsky, Jewish Voice for Peace, Max Blumenthal, Jason Bermas, Luke Rudkowski, etc.

Japan Bites Back: Documents Contextualizing Pearl Harbor by Joshua Blakeney

Solving 9/11: The Original Articles by Christopher Bollyn

Solving 9/11: The Deception That Changed the World  by Christopher Bollyn

No “theories” here. Bollyn lays out the facts about “Israeli” involvement in the September 11th false flag attack that killed thousands of innocent Americans along with creating wars that killed millions of innocent Muslims & Christians in West Asia (aka the Middle East).

The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East by Christopher Bollyn

The Occult and Subversive Movements by Kerry Bolton

Perón and Perónism by Kerry Bolton

Yockey: A Fascist Odyssey by Kerry Bolton

Babel Inc.: Multiculturalism, Globalisation, and the New World Order by Kerry Bolton

The Zionists create wars that create refugees, then they pretend to care about refugees and welcome them into Europe and the West, where they are then used as political pawns to destroy both the West and the East in a typical divide and conquer ploy. Wahabbi migrants exert their radicalism on foreign soil, whereas the average Muslim diaspora is brainwashed by secular liberalism and the children of migrants become cringe feminists and Trotskyites who endorse homosexuality, or even at the very least if they don’t become radlibs, they just become cogs in the corporate machine, living the same zombie 9-5 life that everyone else lives; centering their life around the material instead of God. Given the hatred that Jewish supremacists have for both Christians and Muslims, it is imperative that both groups understand how Zionists use mass migration as a weapon. Don’t believe me? Just ask European Jewish activist Barbara Lerner Specter. Also, the world’s biggest corporations as well as political lobbyists financed by the Koch Brothers support liberal immigration policies in the West, because it allows for cheap labor exploits and also that fake, manufactured “diversity” in the workplace reduces chances of unionization. In the larger picture, the agenda of globohomo seeks to make the global liberal man (or person, since gender-neutrality is part of this hideous agenda) who can live in any part of the world, speak English at least as a second language, become a corporate slave, and eat McDonald’s. What this does is tear down nations that can potentially stand up to Zionism and the banking cartel. A nation has something to unite on: religion, race, philosophy, political views, etc. that have naturally been a part of their existence for hundreds if not thousands of years. When they are united, they can have a strong, independent nation with a strong military. Kind of like the Islamic Republic of Iran. Shattering nations into bits by putting all peoples in the world – except for Jews – into a blender of “multiculturalism” will destroy the unity of potential enemies of Zion.

Russia and the Fight Against Globalization by Kerry Bolton

Behind Communism by Frank Britton

Queer Theory and the Jewish Question by Daniel Boyarin, Daniel Itzkovitz, and Ann Pellegrini

This book, published by the prestigious Columbia University Press, details the Jewish role in promoting sexual perversion throughout global society.

The Jews of Khazaria by Kevin Alan Brook

This isn’t an “antisemitic” “conspiracy” book. It’s a straight-forward academic historical book that looks upon the Jewish kingdom of Khazaria in a positive lens, and is even endorsed by Jewish authors and magazines on the back cover’s blurb section. Undoubtedly, Ashkenazis, who make up the majority of Jews today, are not descendants of Semitic tribes. Even if they were, being Semitic doesn’t make anyone good or bad. Jesus (as) was a Semite, but so were the Jewish rabbis who persecuted him and his chaste mother Mary.

Holy Rus’ by John P. Burgess

An amazing look into how Orthodox Christianity survived its near extinction under the grip of militant atheism of the Communist era in Russia.

Arabian Nights: The Book of a Thousand Nights and a Night translated by Sir Richard Burton

War Is a Racket by Major General Smedley Butler

Fidel Castro: My Life – A Spoken Autobiography by Fidel Castro and Ignacio Ramonet

This Non-Violent Stuff’ll Get You Killed! by Charles Cobb, Jr.

For My Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

Behold a Pale Horse by William Cooper

Public Vows: A History of Marriage and Nation by Nancy Cott

While I haven’t read the full book and I don’t necessarily endorse everything this author writes, as perhaps she endorses homosexual “marriage.” But anyway, she describes the idea of strict societal monogamy as an invention of modern liberal capitalism, and that other forms of marriage like religious polygamy (found in Islam as well as in American Mormonism) were outlawed by this new social model and then promoted around the world as part of Western cultural imperialism. The idea of love we have is so convoluted by Disney fantasies, we forget that it is the ego that says things like “my money, my spouse, my house, my belongings, my my my my” when in reality these are all from Allah and all His blessings, we own none of them, and while monogamy is not bad, the idea that close to 0% of the population practices Islamic polygamy, when it can help to reduce some personal and social problems of the small percentage of the population that have certain problems that can be solved by it, just goes to show how out of balance we are by making it totally taboo and teaching our girls a fake, ego-centric definition of love and marriage that encourages them to be possessive over their spouse, as long as their husband is capable of being equitable and does polygamy for loftier reasons than just earthly ones.

North Korea: Another Country by Bruce Cumings

Islam in Black America by Edward Curtis

George’s Marvelous Medicine by Roald Dahl

Fantastic Mr. Fox by Roald Dahl

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory by Roald Dahl

Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator by Roald Dahl

James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl

Goebbels on the Jews by Thomas Dalton

The Butterfly’s Burden by Mahmoud Darwish

(((Culture Vultures))) by Damon Dash

A hip-hop insider names the names of all the (mostly Jewish) showbiz CEOs have taken over hip-hop to take away its socio-political voice and replace it with content that promotes sins and vices like drugs, gangbanging, and abuse of women.

The Magnesium Miracle by Dr. Carolyn Dean

Why Liberalism Failed by Patrick Deneen

Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky

The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoevsky

The Idiot by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Demons by Fyodor Dostoevsky

A Writer’s Diary, Vol. 2 by Fyodor Dostoevsky

Altered Genes, Twisted Truth by Steven M. Druker

The Fourth Political Theory by Alexandr Dugin

Putin vs. Putin by Alexandr Dugin

Last War of the World-Island: The Geopolitics of Contemporary Russia by Alexandr Dugin

Esoteric Hollywood: Sex, Cults, and Symbols in Film by Jay Dyer

Esoteric Hollywood 2 by Jay Dyer

Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin: A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me by Dietrich Eckart

The Hidden Messages in Water by Dr. Masaru Emoto

Cancergate: How to Win the Losing Cancer War by Samuel Epstein

Even though it is written by an Epstein, it is nonetheless a beneficial look into the fraud of cancer research organizations and how they do not want to find a cure.

Judah P. Benjamin: The Jewish Confederate by Eli N. Evans

The Secretary of State of the Confederate States of America was a Jewish man. Fact.

Revolt Against the Modern World by Julius Evola

A Dying Colonialism by Frantz Fanon

Is the Diary of Anne Frank Genuine? by Dr. Robert Faurisson

Shahnameh by Ferdowsi

The literary legacy of Iran.

The Aquarian Conspiracy by Marilyn Ferguson

This is another book that is heralded by the globalist elites of the Dajjal/antichrist system. Reading it helps you to understand the agenda of what they want to do with us.

The House of Rothschild by Niall Ferguson

The Holocaust Industry by Norman Finkelstein

Bobby Fischer Teaches Chess by Bobby Fischer

Bobby Fischer was one of the world’s greatest and most intelligent chess champions. What he is less known for is being able to accurately assess who runs this corrupt, unjust, bloodstained world we live in. If you’re going to learn how to play the mind-challenging sport of chess, you might as well learn it from someone who was able to see the head of the snake of the Satanic world order.

The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem by Henry Ford

Facts Are Facts by Benjamin Freedman

Red Mafiya: How the (((Russian Mob))) Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman

Zealots for Zion: Inside Israel’s West Bank Settlement Movement by Robert Friedman

False Prophet: Rabbi Meir Kahane – From FBI Informant to Knesset Member by Robert Friedman

Waters Flowing Eastward: The War Against the Kingship of Christ by Leslie Fry (a.k.a. Paquita de Shishmareff)

This book details the authenticity of the Protocols of Zion.

The Founding Myths of Modern Israel by Roger Garaudy

The Prophet by Khalil Gibran

The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State by Benjamin Ginsberg

In this book, the author details how Jews had roles in powerful governments around the world. The most intriguing example of this are the Jews that served as advisers to the Ummayad dynasty, the despotic dictatorship most famous for killing Imam Hasan (as) and Imam Hussain (as), the grandchildren of the Prophet Muhammad (S).

No Beauty in the Beast: Israel Without Her Mascara by Mark Glenn

The Collected Tales of Nikolai Gogol by Nikolai Gogol (translated by Pevear, Volokhonsky)

Spy Schools by Daniel Golden

About how US intelligence agencies recruit spies from top universities in the West.

Emancipation by Michael Goldfarb

One of the gems in this book, written by a Jewish author, is the description of the relationship between Karl Marx and Moses Hess. While they had differences, Hess was undoubtedly an influence on Marx. Hess was a big time liberal Zionist. This helps to break down the myth that Marxism is truly for the masses, rather it is a controlled opposition ideology with big ties to Zionism.

Acapella Revolution by Professor Griff (Public Enemy)

The Psychological Covert War on Hip-Hop by Professor Griff (Public Enemy)

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine 9/11 “Conspiracy Theory” by David Ray Griffin

9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation by David Ray Griffin

The Crisis of the Modern World by René Guénon

The Reign of Quantity & the Signs of the Times by René Guénon

Chávez: Venezuela & the New Latin America by Aleida Guevara

The Motorcycle Diaries by Ernesto Che Guevara

The Bolivian Diary by Ernesto Che Guevara

Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War by Ernesto Che Guevara

Guerilla Warfare by Ernesto Che Guevara

From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land…Clash of Civilizations by Laurent Guyénot

Peace Be Upon Ibrahim by Martyr Ibrahim Hadi (collection of his letters, writings, and sayings compiled by anonymous group of supporters of the martyrs)

Divan-e-Hafez by Hafez

The Sandhills of Arabia by Laila Hasib

Channels of Resistance in Lebanon: Liberation Propaganda, Hezbollah, and the Media by Zahera Harb

Ruthless: A Memoir by Jerry Heller

Jerry Heller was a Jewish music business executive who had ties to the JDL terrorist organization. He purposefully built up gangster rap by giving stardom to former crack dealers like Eazy-E in order to kill socio-politically conscious hip-hop. If they are really God’s “chosen” people, then why do they spread such ungodly, immoral filth worldwide to the masses?

Rome and Jerusalem: A Study in Jewish Nationalism by Moses Hess

Moses Hess is the little-known godfather of Marxism, who had deep influence on Marx despite their differences. This book is Hess pouring his heart out in this proto-Zionist treatise in where he declares the need for creating a Jewish supremacist ethno-state on top of the indigenous Palestinian population.

Mein Kampf: The Official 1939 English Translation by Adolf Hitler

Before you freak out, kvetch, or even bellow out an “Oy vey wit ze antisemitism” knee-jerk reaction, you probably should re-read my disclaimer above: I do not necessarily endorse any book or author that is in this list, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t read original historical sources. Hitler did not kill 6 million Jews – Jewish holocaust expert Raul Hillberg testified under oath at the Ernst Zundel trial that there was no such thing as an order for a “final solution” given by the German government. There are all sorts of scientific and other evidences to suggest that it is impossible to have killed that many people that fast. Rather, all the footage we see of the camps are after the American occupation of Germany, when America firebombed major civilian and military targets in Germany, destroying the supply lines to both the German people and the prisoners of war at the work camps (read: NOT “death camps”), causing both groups to suffer from hunger and easily preventable contagious diseases, such as typhus. Yes, a few hundred thousand Jews did die in WW2 and the majority of deaths were caused by the Allies’ indiscriminate bombing of Germany and her allies (P.S.: during the post-war occupation of Germany, America ran ACTUAL death camps in Germany). The truth establishes that Hitler was not the monster that he is painted to be. However, I will refrain from endorsing him or ascribing a positive view of him. We’ve negated the monster, since the event known as the holocaust is exaggerated at best and mostly a fabrication at worst. But I will not go beyond negating the negative aspects of the view of him in history and will not ascribe a positive view of him either, so don’t accuse me of being a Hitler supporter. He did indeed have a racialist approach and had problematic anti-Slavic views. Personally, I prefer Otto Ernst Remer and Johann Von Leers, who were far less racialist and were also incredibly pro-Islam, von Leers having converted to Islam and changed his name to Omar Amin. My Modus Operandi when it comes to history is buckling down and reading the original sources for themselves as much as is possible – so why should it be off-limits when it comes to Germany and WW2? Forget even holocaust revisionism, at the very least our attitude towards history is to read it as it is so it may expand our horizons and understanding of the context, no matter how controversial it is, which is why I also have the books of Zionist Jews whose butchery is far worse than anything Hitler has done, real or fabricated.

Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit by Michael Hoffman

Historian, scholar, and Christian author Michael Hoffman has done the painful task of studying the Babylonian Jewish Talmud to show all the racist, blasphemous, and downright hideous teachings of the Jewish ideology, such as the cursing of holy figures like Jesus and Muhammad to racism against specific groups of gentiles (blacks, Arabs, Persians, etc.) to gentiles in general. No, it is not “taken out of context” nor “fabricated verses.” His book has never been refuted, he has only been subject to smears and character assassinations.

The Great Holocaust Trial by Michael Hoffman

They Were White and They Were Slaves by Michael Hoffman

To the End of the Earth: A History of the Crypto-Jews of New Mexico by Stanley M. Hordes

Published by Columbia University Press

Sabra and Shatila: September 1982 by Bayan Nuwayhed al-Hout

On Resistance to Evil by Force by Ivan Ilyin

War on the Horizon: Black Resistance to the Homophile Assault by The Irritated Genie of Soufeese

Hitler’s War by David Irving

An independent account of World War 2 filled with rare declassified documents and first-hand testimony from those who lived through the war.

Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden by David Irving

The Frankfurt School, Jewish Lives, and “Antisemitism” by Dr. Jack Jacobs

The author of the book is Jewish and documents how the leaders of the Frankfurt School were avid readers of the Talmud (which defames and insults Jesus and Mary). Modern concepts like feminism, the view of the family as an oppressive institution, identity politics, LGBTQ, and other forms of moral decay were pushed by this quasi-Marxist think tank. Their influence on modern culture, from political correctness to sexual degeneracy, can be seen in prominence today.

The Life of the Messenger by Shaykh Rasul Ja’fariyan

The Third Rome: Holy Russia, Tsarism, & Orthodoxy by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson

Russian Populist: The Political Thought of Vladimir Putin by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson

Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality: Lectures on Medieval Russia  by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson

The Ancient Orthodox Tradition in Russian Literature by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson

Ukrainian Nationalism by Dr. Matthew Raphael Johnson

Discourse on Patience by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei

The 250 Year Old Man by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei

The Compassionate Family by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei

In a time where the family unit is under attack by secular liberal internationalism, this book is an absolute treasure and makes us re-think our priorities in life.

Christ in the Night of Glory Collected accounts of Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei’s visits to the families of Armenian and Assyrian Christian martyrs of the Iran-Iraq war from 1984 to 2015

Islamic Beliefs: Reclaiming the Narrative by Ayatollah Sayed Ali Khamenei

Islam and Revolution by Imam Ruhollah Khomeini (Translated & Compiled by Dr. Hamid Algar)

There has not been any man more villified than Imam Khomeini. His words, which are as eloquent as they are sagacious, vindicate him from all slander. He was both a revolutionary and a gnostic, and contrary to the lies told about him, he was a friend of humanity as a whole.

40 Hadiths: An Exposition by Imam Ruhollah Khomeini

Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21 by Rosa Koire

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and the Modern Russo-Jewish Question by Nathan D. Larson

The Chronicles of Narnia (Novel Saga) by C.S. Lewis

The National System of Political Economy by Friedrich List

Liberalism: A Counter-History by Domenico Losurdo

The Coddling of the American Mind by Greg Lukianoff

The Great Famine & Genocide in Iran: 1917-1919 by Muhammad Gholi Majd

The Natural First-Aid Handbook by Brigette Mars

Marcus Garvey, Hero: A First Biography  by Dr. Tony Martin

The Jewish Onslaught by Dr. Tony Martin

The first-hand account of what happens when a tenured Afro-American professor at a prestigious university tries to teach the facts about Jewish involvement in the African slave trade to his class.

What Really Happened in Nanking: The Refutation of a Common Myth by Tanaka Masaaki

Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update by Donella H. Meadows

A creepy book written by one of the front groups for global Zionism, The Club of Rome. This book is all about depopulation – and the authors support such a genocidal policy!

The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal by Dr. Joseph Mercola and Ronnie Cummins

Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science by Dr. Judy Mikovits

A well-respected scientist who had her career wrongfully destroyed under bogus circumstances, Dr. Mikovits exposes the dark history of corruption in the field of science. She addresses the issue in general, but also points specifically at Dr. Anthony Fauci, her former colleague, and exposes his intentional mishandling of the HIV/AIDS crisis.

The Covenants of the Prophet Muhammad with the Christians of the World by John Andrew Morrow, PhD

This historical book absolutely shatters the myth that the Prophet Muhammad (S) was hostile to Christians and shows that any hostility towards Christians happened only after the death of the Prophet at the hands of those who usurped the seat of power in the Islamic world and acted outside the religion itself.

Encyclopedia of Islamic Herbal Medicine by John Andrew Morrow, PhD

Showcases both the scientific as well as religious proof (from the narrations of the Prophet and his family) for various herbal medicines used in the Islamic world.

The Muhammadan Cure: The Modern Science of Prophetic Medicine by Bilal Muhammad

All the Perfumes of Arabia by Bilal Muhammad

The Rise of the Qa’im by Bilal Muhammad

The Fall of America by The Honorable Elijah Muhammad

How to Eat to Live by The Honorable Elijah Muhammad

The Syrian Social Nationalist Party: Its Ideology and History by Salim Mujais

Fundamentals of Islamic Thought: God, Man, and the Universe by Martyr Ayatollah Murtaza Mutahhari

Sexual Ethics in Islam and in the Western World by Martyr Ayatollah Murtaza Mutahhari

Woman and Her Rights [in Islam] by Martyr Ayatollah Murtaza Mutahhari

The European New Right – A Shi’a Response: A Radical Critique of Alexander Dugin, E. Michael Jones, and Alain de Benoist by Shaykh Arash Najafzadeh

This book addresses some of the philosophies of contemporary European nationalist and traditionalist movements from the Islamic perspective, finding faults in their philosophy as well as practical aspects of their politics. He mostly addresses it from a metaphysical perspective, as the reality of the world is entirely dependent on the only true one reality: God. However, he doesn’t support pushing Shi’a Islam onto Europe. If third position or fourth position is what is best for them, so be it, but their philosophical flaws are an Achilles’ Heel that will present many problems for them in the future. Given that I have some of Alexander Dugin’s books in my library, it doesn’t mean that I endorse his ideology 100% and it is good to get a counterpoint about some of the flaws of his worldview, especially from a Shi’i perspective.

Barefoot Gen (Graphic Novel Series) by Keiji Nakazawa

Lies the Government Told You by Judge Andrew Napolitano

Voice of Hezbollah Collected statements of Sayed Hasan Nasrallah, Secretary General of Hezbollah (Edited by Nicholas Noe)

The lies told by the Zionist media about this innocent man are vindicated by his own words. He is a defender of people who are under attack from a terrorist regime known as “Israel.” He is not a monster nor a murderer, and certainly not a terrorist.

No Surrender by Hiroo Onoda

A Japanese soldier in the Philippines believed that the end of the war was American propaganda, so he and his small battalion stayed and continued their missions. Eventually they began to reduce their missions and simply live out in the wilderness in loyalty to their Emperor and nation. Eventually, only Onoda was left and it wasn’t until his commander came back to the Philippines sometime in the 1970s did he finally give in and surrender. Upon returning to Japan, he was sickened by the secular liberal Western culture that had infected Japanese society, so he moved to Brazil with his brother to a farm. He then came back to Japan to teach youth self-reliance and loyalty.

Fatima the Gracious by Abu Muhammad Ordoni

By Way of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky

How to Pray a Good Prayer by Sheikh Alireza Panahian

Preparing for the Month of Ramadan: God’s Banquet by Sheikh Alireza Panahian

The Revolution by Ron Paul

End the Fed by Ron Paul

What’s Making Our Children Sick? by Michelle Perro, MD

Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy by Michael Collins Piper

With all the disinformation surrounding JFK conspiracy research, this clear cut piece goes where no author dare go to: the real criminals themselves, that is the “Israeli” regime and Jewish mobsters like Meyer Lansky.

The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme by Michael Collins Piper

High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper

Confessions of an “Antisemite” by Michael Collins Piper

The Judas Goats by Michael Collins Piper

This book details how Jewish supremacists and white supremacists work hand-in-hand. Despite claiming to be “anti-racist” activists who stand against intolerance and bigotry, Jews have actually bolstered and upheld intolerance and bigotry, pushing whites against blacks in order to prevent both whites and blacks from becoming wise to the Jewish supremacists who wield disproportionate economic and political power in the United States. Malcolm X confirms this in his autobiography.

The Golem: Israel’s Nuclear Hell Bomb and the Road to Armageddon by Michael Collins Piper

The Lives of the Twelve: The Social & Political Lives of the Twelve Infallible Imams (a) by Shaykh Mahdi Pishva’i

The Orthodox Church in the History of Russia by Dimitry Pospielovsky

The Educational System in Islam by Baqir Sharif al-Qarashi

Hizbullah: The Story from Within by Sheikh Naim Qasem

Tragedy & Hope by Caroll Quigley

Currency Wars by James Rickards

Rickards is a real bastard. He bragged about how the Obama sanctions helped to tank Iran’s currency (Rouhani & the liberal technocrats didn’t make the situation any better either). But it is good to investigate the enemy’s words to see what they admit about their own schemes.

Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg

The Wanderers: The Saga of Three Women Who Survived by Ingrid Rimland

The Jewish Confederates by Robert N. Rosen

Another historical book written by a Jewish author about the Jewish role in the slave-trading American south.

Hizbullah: Politics & Religion by Amal Saad

An Inquiry Concerning al-Mahdi by Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir as-Sadr

Iqtisaduna: Our Economics by Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir as-Sadr

Critique of Marxist Philosophy by Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir as-Sadr

The Book of Metaphysical Penetrations by Mulla Sadra

The Elixir of the Gnostics by Mulla Sadra

Orientalism by Edward Said

The Essential Saker II: The Russian Challenge to the Hegemony of the Anglo-Zionist Empire by The Saker

You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel

One Day in My Life by Bobby Sands

Writings from Prison by Bobby Sands

Thomas Sankara Speaks by Thomas Sankara

Who Paid the Piper? – CIA and the Cultural Cold War by Frances Saunders

About how the CIA (or the then pre-cursor to the CIA) employed the Frankfurt School academics (forefathers of Critical Theory) who fled Germany. These academics were mostly Zionist Jews. The CIA worked with them to create a “New Left” that was anti-Soviet, anti-Cuba, anti-DPRK, etc. This New Left was more anarchist, Trotskyite, and appealed to the middle class intelligentsia instead of the working class whom they looked down upon as rifraff. Instead of supporting the rights of workers, they supported homosexuality, identity politics/cultural warfare, feminism, and other divisive policies that sought to tear society apart and promote immorality. This is why the Western Left is so cringe.

The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters by Frances Saunders

This book has a similar theme as her other book but delves into how the CIA achieved a similar goal of forming this New Left by supporting the American counterculture movement via the MK Ultra program and its false messiahs like Timothy Leary and Alan Watts. They financed artists like Jackson Pollack and supported events like the “Human Be-In” which featured New Age “gurus” like Ram Dass and pedophile poets like Allen Ginsberg.

Jesus in the Talmud by Professor Peter Schäfer

Professor Schäfer is a Jewish lecturer at Princeton University. In this book he confirms the slander that is used against Jesus within the passages of the Jewish Talmud. Of course, one can read the Rabbi Steinsaltz edition (which is uncensored and doesn’t replace Jesus with Titus or Balaam) of the Bavli Talmud (Tractate Gittin) themselves and see the slander firsthand.

They Came Before Columbus by Ivan Van Sertima

The Autobiography of Malcolm X by al-Hajj Malik ash-Shabazz (Malcolm X) (with Alex Haley)

Aside from the inspiration for political revolutionaries, this story is a spiritual journey of redemption and salvation through the mercy of Allah. However, it should be taken with a grain of salt since it came through Alex Haley, a journalist who worked for Playboy. He may have embellished the truth in regards to the dispute between Malcolm and the Nation of Islam, which feeds into the FBI’s official story that the NOI killed Malcolm, when the reality exonerates the NOI from the murder. In 1995, Farrakhan and Mrs. Shabazz held a unity rally where Farrakhan cleared himself of any role in the murder, but admitted that the government abused and took advantage of the emotions and zeal of both sides, including the zeal that Farrakhan had towards the Honorable Elijah Muhammad.

Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3,000 Years by Professor Israel Shahak

Israel’s Global Role: Weapons for Repression by Professor Israel Shahak

Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel by Professor Israel Shahak

The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare

Fatima Is Fatima by Dr. Ali Shariati

On the Sociology of Islam by Dr. Ali Shariati

Marxism and Other Western Fallacies by Dr. Ali Shariati

The Science Delusion by Rupert Sheldrake

Phoenix Tears: The Rick Simpson Story by Rick Simpson

Nature’s Answer for Cancer by Rick Simpson

How cannabis can cure/control many diseases like cancer and why Big Pharma is intentionally censoring it. Truly makes you realize how sick this world is.

The Canon of Medicine (Alternative Title: Avicenna’s Medicine) by Abu Ali Husayn ibn Sina (Avicenna)

The Gulag Archipelago by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

In the First Circle by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The Red Wheel Node 1: August 1914 by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The Red Wheel Node 2: November 1916 by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

The Red Wheel Node 3: March 1917 by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Warning to the West by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

200 Years Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (Has yet to be translated to English!)

One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Fallacies in the Allied Nations’ Historical Perception as Observed by a British Journalist by Henry Scott Stokes

The Philosophy of Illumination by Shihab ad-Din Suhrawardi

Countdown by Shanna H. Swan, PhD

About how all the small amounts of harmful chemicals we consume on a daily basis through our foods, daily use products, and more are causing a decline in fertility rates across the globe.

The Elements of Islamic Metaphysics by Allamah Muhammad Tabatabai

Sunan an-Nabi by Allamah Muhammad Tabatabai

Some ‘urafa (Islamic gnostic scholars) suggest picking one of the traits listed in this compilation of the traits of the Prophet Muhammad (S) and working on that trait for one or two weeks until it is embedded in our behavior, then moving on to the next.

Society and Economics in Islam by Ayatollah Mahmud Taleghani

Hitler’s Revolution by Richard Tedor

The Vaccine-Friendly Plan by Paul Thomas, MD and Jennifer Margulis, PhD

This book is not against vaccines. However, it suggests that the frequency of vaccines can be reduced to avoid potential risk factors but at the same time still vaccinating your children. This is a credible, evidence-based book that addresses both extreme ends of this polarized debate surrounding vaccines.

Ship Without a Country: Eyewitness Accounts of the Attack on the USS Liberty by Victor Thorn and Mark Glenn

Blood Passover: The Jews of Europe and Ritual Murders by Ariel Toaff

This is not an “antisemitic” “conspiracy theory” book. It was written by the son of the Chief Rabbi of Italy. There was no outcry about this book until it was translated from Hebrew to Italian.

War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy

Peter the First by Alexey Tolstoy

Yes, this author is indeed related to the iconic Russian literary genius Lev Nikolaevich (Leo) Tolstoy, as well as Ivan Turgenev. However, he was much different ideologically than those two. Whereas Lev Tolstoy and Turgenev were Christians, Alexey Tolstoy was ebbing and flowing between differing ideologies. He embraced Marxism at one point, and then left the newly-formed USSR after the foreign-backed Red Terror. Then he fought with various White Guard Russian nationalist paramilitary groups who were loyal to the Tsar even after the royal family was brutally butchered by Jewish Bolshevik terrorists. Then after returning to Russia, he became a loyal Stalinist and helped to create some of the propaganda that would be used to shove the myth of the “holocaust” down the rest of the world’s throats. I obviously have stark disagreements with this Tolstoy, both in his Marxism and the perpetuation of a myth that is being used to this day to prop up the illegitimate Zionist entity. However, he represents the various nuances in Russian society and Russian politics. He has been in both the nationalist camp, the Marxist camp, and at times hybrids of both, from what I understand. Too often is Russian history and politics oversimplified for the sake of clickbait articles on all sides. But those who actually know even one ounce of Russian history know that it too complex to pidgeonhole into one box. Studying the literature of Alexey Tolstoy puts is in the middle of that dynamic, and allows us to contrast it with Christian conservative authors like Turgenev, Dostoevsky, and others.

Desert Hell: The British Invasion of Mesopotamia by Charles Townshend

Hagakure: The Secret Wisdom of the Samurai by Yamamoto Tsunetomo

The Jew and Other Stories by Ivan Turgenev

Fathers and Sons by Ivan Turgenev

The Art of War by Sun Tzu

Vectors of the Counter-Initiation by Charles Upton

Dugin Against Dugin: A Traditionalist Critique of the Fourth Political Theory by Charles Upton

Medical Apartheid by Harriet Washington

Dark Alliance: The CIA, Contras, and the Crack Cocaine Explosion by Gary Webb

Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel by Alison Weir

Despite the slander campaign waged against the author by gatekeepers like Max Blumenthal, half of this book is a bibliography of the citations and sources used, most of which are primarily from Jewish academic and scholarly sources. This book is an absolute gem for the history of Zionism.

Imperium by Francis Parker Yockey

Minority Rights by Abbasali Zanjani

The Khazars: A Judeo-Turkish Empire on the Steppes (7th-11th Centuries AD) by Mikhail Zhirohov and David Nicolle

A purely historical book on how a large group of non-Semitic inhabitants belonging to the Khazarian empire converted to Judaism.

The post Truth Shall Set Us Free: The Bookshelf More Valuable Than a Western Neoliberal University Education appeared first on Insight Media.

Editor’s note: Republishing this article by The Saker aims to deal with the two prevailing extremes when it comes to the discourse surrounding Russia in anti-Zionist circles. Both extremes seem to be tiny in number, though some among them are very loud and pervasive, and some of their motives are questionable at best and nefarious at worst.

One extreme says that Putin is an anti-Zionist savior that will send in Russian forces to liberate Palestine. The other extreme says that Putin is a ZOG puppet, Russia is controlled by Zionists, and so-called “Putinists” suffer from mental disorders (yes, they resort to ad hominem) for thinking that Russia has some positive role to play in challenging the major arrogant powers, or that the Russian people (moreso than the government) have a positive role to play in a Christian-Muslim alliance against the antichrist system (aka Dajjal). This article shows that the truth is with neither of those extremes.

No sane and rational supporter of the current manifestation of the Russian Federation under the leadership of President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin thinks that the Russian Army will swoop in and liberate Palestine. Putin himself has politics that are half liberal/internationalist, and half religious conservative nationalist, and there are some shady dealings with liberals and Zionists, but not to the point of being subordinate to them like in the Western governments.

The Orthodox Church which has returned to prominence in Russian society, thanks in part to Putin’s leadership, holds that the antichrist will be a Jew. How much Putin listens to that, only time will tell. He has pressure from Russian nationalist leadership, which exist heavily among the people (who support him for his nationalist tendencies, not his liberal ones), as well as in the top brass of the military. The Resistance Axis is self-sufficient and doesn’t need Russia to be part of it, which she is not. And if she were to oppose the Resistance, she would swiftly lose and gain no strategic ground in the conflict.

Support of Russia and/or Putin doesn’t mean a blind support nor should it come without criticism. The USSR was at war with Iran during the 1980s; one of the last Tsars, despite his many positive points in standing against the crimes of international Jewry, committed a massacre of Shia pilgrims at the Imam Reza Shrine in Mashhad; now Russia has friendly relations with Iran. Hezbollah and Hamas are not terrorist organizations in Russia. Whereas America is a full blown ZOG and is the center of homosexuality (even so-called “pro-family” conservatives promote Sodomite culture in both domestic and foreign policy, from Mike Pence to Turning Point USA), Russia holds a diplomatic relationship with “israel” but is not a ZOG puppet state, and has maintained a traditional, values-based society in spite of decades of Communism and a decade of liberalism. Their diplomacy with “israel” has issues and problems, but they are not order takers. Russia comes to the table as the master of its own destiny, and that is a positive point to build upon in a sea of subservient nations who are in the palms of the hands of the Rothschild dynasty.

None of us hold an orientalist view that Russia is the shining European savior come in to save the “backwards” Arabs from NATO aggression, and that without Russia they don’t have the wherewithal to defeat the monsters themselves.

However, we do understand Russian history, the history of the Orthodox Church, and Russia’s historical resistance to Jewish power under the Tsars (not that the Tsars were perfect, but they were quite admirable compared to the butchers of European colonial regimes, albeit Tsarist Russia’s own colonialism which is condemnable but still very small in comparison to its Western Catholic/Protestant rivals), not the least of which is preventing usurers from engaging in finance and discovering a secret manuscript that would later be published into the series known as the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. After that, Jewish Marxists waged the Bolshevik revolution as a war on Christian-Islamic Russia (ironically, most of the peanut gallery on the left who are attacking Russia, Putin, Dugin, and Russia’s resurgence of religious/family values are Jewish Trotskyites, but we’ll save naming the names of that crowd for a later article). We must also not forget anti-parasitic authors like Fyodor Dostoevsky, Ivan Turgenev, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and many more. There was a TV series recently produced and funded by the Russian military called Sophia (available on Amazon Video with English subs), about the heiress to the Byzantine Orthodox Christian Empire who married the Russian Moscovite Prince. At the end of the series, there is a plot to assassinate Princess Sophia by a group that is literally described by the narrator as taking their beliefs from pagan black magic and Judaism. Russian military funded TV show names the J. It would be nice if these “analysts” would at least include this in their conjectures, even if they end up with the same conclusion that Russia is a ZOG – for at least they would have been fair and balanced in their process of reaching such a conclusion.

After the fall of the USSR, Jewish capitalists tried to run Russia into the ground until Putin stepped in and kicked almost all of them out. “BuT He dIdN’T KiCk aLl oF ThE JeWiSh oLiGaRcHs oUt!”, some of you will say. Fair enough. Need I remind you that the last major world leader – outside of West Asia (aka the Middle East) – to stand up to Jewish power was JFK and he got his brains blown out in public. Putin himself has had more than a few assassination attempts on him. If he was the Jews’ horse, they wouldn’t try to execute the horse they want to win the race. It’s only been 18 or 19 years since he came into power, do you really expect him to dethrone the biggest global mafia on earth in such a short period of time? Especially when having to rebuild a country that was burnt to the ground with decades of Communism and 10 years of vulture capitalism? You go become president of Russia and see how easy it is to take down the people who have gotten away with assassinating plenty of presidents and world leaders before you. These foolhardy armchair strategists’ mouths would shut real quick if they were put into real world situations. Additionally, Putin’s MO is nationalism. He puts Russia’s interests first, for the most part. If he can tame the parasites into not subverting Russia’s national interests, then he’ll leave them be. That has its pitfalls, as Russia’s presence in West Asia is centered around its own interests (which may conflict with the interests of the nation of the region at times), but for anything to change in politics, there must be an awakening of the Russian population, but without repeating the bloody revolutions of the past, as such changes should take place legitimately and not through subversion of the state and the stability of the Russian nation.

That doesn’t mean that Putin is free from criticism; in his role as a pragmatic diplomat, he does make mistakes, he could be partially corrupted in the midst of this dirty game, and certainly dealing with such a rotten system is not easy to get everywhere you want so easily (if the will exists), and he does have a liberal streak that causes him to not place much importance on dealing with the banking elite in Russia, so long as they play ball with the system and don’t act like complete parasites, but they are snakes laying in the wait for the proper moment to pounce.

Criticism of Putin should be done from an academic perspective. We should avoid attempts to create a division between gentiledom, especially between Christians and Muslims. Anyone who tries to sow such division should be treated with suspicion. Because the issue here is not blindly following the Kremlin. If they make a mistake, we won’t support them. This is a spiritual issue that is related to the end times: there will be a connection between Muslims and Christians in support of Jesus and the Mahdi, united against the antichrist. This is beyond the Russian government, and goes into the Orthodox Christian populations of the world, from Russia to Armenia to Syria to Iran. It is not fair to assume that calling for such a meaningful interfaith brotherhood equals unwielding blind endorsement of every single policy coming out of the Kremlin, or that it means to ignore some of Putin’s shady dealings with liberals and Zionists.

The real test of Putin comes after these recent Constitutional Reforms which implant the word God, family values (i.e. same-sex “marriage” and LGBTQP propaganda is made illegal at the highest law of the land), gives recognition to ethnic Russians as the progenitors and inheritors of the nation, prevents dual-citizens from taking high office, prevents Western-educated liberals from taking office immediately after returning home from abroad (requires them to live in Russia for many years until being eligible to serve), and many more pro-sovereignty measures. These amendments are a good legacy move on Putin’s part, but now that Russia is stable and sovereign, his true colors will be shown. However, the deep states of the Western ZOGs are ratcheting up color revolutions in Belarus, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, and more, so we can give him a little room for caution and making smart moves in reaction to these situations. However, he should not get a free pass as he did for the past 20 years, because stability was often the excuse to justify cautious diplomatic approaches to issues. However, polling suggests that more nationalist Russian political parties are growing in popularity and will likely take the country by storm in the coming elections, which means that the future for Russia is warmer relations with Iran, Syria, etc. and strengthened relations with the church, more penalities for the banker parasites, and more, so the likelihood of Russia becoming a ZOG in the future is not a certainty.

Lastly, we don’t expect nor need Russia to be a revolutionary anti-Zionist nation. We have Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah for that. However, Russia exists and it exists with the weight of history (which includes a history of anti-parasitism and resistance to Jewish power – the release of the Protocols of Zion was done by the Tsar’s police in the newspapers) and its current complicated, multi-layered geo-political circumstances. Those circumstances compel it to be a diplomatic, pragmatic hedge against NATO and the Western ZOGs.

Russia has a complicated history, both past and present. In the interest of being fair and balanced, we implore critics of Putin (of which we can consider ourselves among them, but not from a standpoint of being subversives who want to destabilize and undermine Russia and the state) to cover all sides of the issue, both the positives and negatives, and then after showing all the facets of the issues, come to a conclusion. Many unfortunately do not, both the Kremlinophiles and the anti-Putin writers. Both stick to cherry-picking one side of the narrative that paints Russia as overly rosy, or overly bleak. Sharing with them views and articles that are contrary to their pre-determined biases goes in one ear and out the other. Those of us who are not as much of experts on Russia are left in a state of confusion as to what to make of factoids that conflict with either of their polarized narratives.

This balanced and insightful analysis by the Saker into the Putin/”Israel” question will put both of the extremes, with their one-dimensional “analysis,” to rest. That way, we can have a nuanced perspective of Russia so that we can have a bridge of friendship open with them, but not dependency nor reliance. The bigger goal is to have a direct alliance with the Orthodox Christian peoples of Russia, so that no matter which way the state goes, they will be our friends and supporters against the Dajjal system.

Written by The Saker – Originally published at The Unz Review on December 23rd, 2015

The recent murder of Samir Kuntar by Israel has, yet again, inflamed the discussion about Putin’s relation to Israel. This is an immensely complicated topic and those who like simple, canned, “explanations” should stop reading right now. The truth is, the relationship between Russia and Israel and, even before that, between Jews and Russians would deserve an entire book. In fact, Alexander Solzhenitsyn has written exactly such a book, it is entitled “200 years together”, but due to the iron grip of the Zionists on the Anglo media, it has still not been translated into English. That should already tell you something right there – an author acclaimed worldwide who got the Nobel Prize for literature cannot get his book translated into English because its contents might undermine the official narrative about Russian-Jewish relations in general and about the role Jews played in Russian 20th century politics in particular! What other proof of the reality of the subordination of the former British Empire to Zionists interest does one need?

I have already written about this topic in the past and, at the very least, I will ask you to read the following two background articles before continuing to read:

• AngloZionist: Short primer for the newcomers
• How a medieval concept of ethnicity makes NATO commit yet another a dangerous blunder

Before looking into some of the idiosyncrasies of the Russian-Israeli relationship I want to stress one very important thing: you should not simply assume that the relationship between Jews and non-Jews in Russia is similar to what it is in the West. This is not the case. Without going through a detailed discussion of the emancipation of Jews in the West and their long track from their rabbi-run shtetls to the boardrooms of the biggest western corporations, I will just say that for Russian Jews this process of emancipation happened in a much more violent and catastrophic way. The second big difference between western Jews and Russian Jews is that roughly between 1917 and 1939 a specific subset of Jews (Bolshevik Jews) were in quasi total control of Russia. During that period the Bolshevik Jews persecuted Russians and, especially, Orthodox Christians with a truly genocidal hate. This is a fact of history which most Russians are very much aware of, even if this is still considered crimethink in most western circles. It is also important to stress here that the Bolshevik Jews persecuted not only Orthodox Christians, but all religious groups, including, by the way, Judaics. Putin is very much aware of all these facts which he addressed when speaking to a group of Judaics in Moscow:

In the 2nd article mentioned above I discussed these issues and all I want to do know is to show you that Putin is very much aware of this past and that he has the courage and intellectual honesty to remind Russian Jews of it.

The other absolutely crucial fact about the relationship between Russia and Israel is the immigration of Russian Jews to Israel. Here I will just submit to you a bullet-point list of why this is a crucial factor:

1. Regardless of whether they ended up in Israel, Austria, Germany, the USA or Israel, the immigration of Russian Jews to Israel made it possible for those Jews who did not want to stay in Russia to leave. Conversely, those who did not leave stayed by choice. This means that the vast majority, if not all, of the rabid russophobes and Christianity-hating Jews have left Russia. Those who stayed in Russia did so because they decided that it was their home.
2. A large number (some estimates go as high has 20%) of so-called “Jews” who left Russia are not Jewish at all, including some of those who settled in Israel. The truth is that the economic and social hardships which faced the Soviet society under Brezhnev & Co and Russia under Eltsin made a lot of non-Jewish Russian invent themselves some (non-existing) Jewish origins just to emigrate. Thus there are many real Russians, as opposed to Russian Jews, in Israel.
3. As a result of this big immigration there are innumerable personal ties between individuals and families living in Israel and Russia. This means that when, say, Iraq or Hezbollah rain rockets in Israel there are folks in Russia who are personally concerned about their friends in Israel even if they don’t necessarily approve of Israeli politics.
4. The so-called “Russian Mafia” is, in reality, mostly a Mafia of Russian Jews. This is particularly true in the West. In Russia there are Jewish mobsters, but not really a Jewish mob as such. Russian and Jewish mobsters get along famously and that also creates, shall we say, strong “business” ties between “Russian” oligarchs and Israel.
5. Eltsin the country was de-facto ruled by what was called the semibankirshchina, the “rule of the Seven Bankers”. These were the seven top bankers of Russia who owned about 50% of the entire Russian economy. All of them except one (Potanin) were Jews.
6. During the Eltisin years, the vast majority of the members of government and, especially, their advisors were Jews. Jews also were in control of almost all of the mainstream media. To give you an idea of how prevalent this trend was in the 1990s, here is a (machine translated) list of top-level Jews in Eltsin’s Russia I have found on the Internet: (source: https://goo.gl/jZlazH )

The oligarchs are Jews in order to ensure the re-election of Boris Yeltsin in the next term in the 1996 presidential election:

1991 – 1999

Boris Yeltsin (Eltsin – Jew married to a Jew).
Naina Yeltsin – a Jew.
Adviser to the President on economic issues – Livshits – JEW.
During all the time of Yeltsin’s rule (1991-1999) the majority of his advisers were Jewish.
Head of Presidential Administration Filatov, Chubais, Voloshin, the daughter of the President (a new position of the Jewish authorities), Tatyana Dyachenko (by Jewish law – Halacha, as the daughter of a Jewish – a Jew) .- All the Jews.

GOVERNMENT

All key ministers – JEWS:
Economy Minister – Yasin – Jew
Zam. Minister of Economy – Urinson – Jew
The Minister of Finance – Panskov – Jew
Zam. Minister of Finance – Vavilov – Jew
Chairman of the Central Bank – Paramonov – Jew
Minister of Foreign Affairs – Kozyrev – Jew
Minister of Energy – Shafranik – Jew
Minister of Communications – Bulhak – Jew
Minister of Natural Resources – Danilov– Jew
Minister of Transport – Efimov – Jew
The Minister of Health – Nechayev – Jew
Minister for Science – Saltykov – Jew
Minister of Culture – Sidorov – Jew

mass media
Chairman of the Media – Rodents – Jew

PRESS
“News” – Golembiovskiy – Jew
“Komsomolskaya Pravda” – Fronin – Jew
“Moskovsky Komsomolets” – Gusev (Drabkin) – Jew
“Arguments and Facts” – Starks – Jew
“Work” – Potapov – Jew
“Moscow News” – Karpinski – Jew
“Kommersant” – Yakovlev (Ginsburg) – Jew
“New Look” – Dodolev – Jew
“Nezavisimaya Gazeta” – Tretyakov – Jew
“Evening Moscow” – Lisin – Jew
“Literary Newspaper” – Udaltsov – Jew
“Publicity” – Izyumov – Jew
“Interlocutor” – Kozlov – Jew
“Rural Life” – Kharlamov – a Jew.
“Top Secret” – Borovik – Jew.

Television and radio:
TV and Radio, “Ostankino” – A. Yakovlev – a Jew.
Russian TV and Radio Company – Poptsov – Jew.
1996-1999 GG – “Seven bankers”.

All Russian finance concentrated in the hands of the Jews.
A country ruled by seven bankers (“seven bankers”):
1.Aven – Jew
2. Berezovsky – a Jew,
3. Gusinsky – a Jew,
4. Potanin (Potanin on different data).
5. Smolensk – Jew
6. Friedman – a Jew,
7. Khodorkovsky – a Jew.
8 Roman Abramovich

The lists of Jews in the Soviet government from 1917-1939 look exactly similar. You can find them on the Internet yourselves.

In truth, folks who compile such lists are rarely motivated by purely scientific purposes and they often don’t feel constrained by strict rules of evidence. So it is quite possible that a certain percentage of “Jews” listed above are not Jews at all. But even with a wide margin of error – you get the picture. Just as between 1917 and 1939, between 1991 and 1999 the reigns of power in Russia were firmly in Jewish hands, and in both cases, with truly catastrophic consequences. The big difference is that if in the early 20th century the Jews in power were ideological opponents of the Anglo Empire, in the late 20th century the Jews in Russia were practically an extension of the AngloZionist Empire.

Speaking of extensions of the AngloZionist Empire.

I have already explained many times in the past that the candidature of Putin to succeed Eltsin was a compromise reached between the Russian security services and Russian “big money” who pushed Medvedev as a counter-weight to Putin. I usually refer to the forces backing Putin as “Eurasian Sovereignists” and the forces backing Medvedev as “Atlantic Integrationists”. The goal of the former is to fully sovereignize Russia and make her a key element in a multi-polar but unified Eurasian continent while the goal of the latter is to be accepted by the AngloZionist Empire as an equal partner and to integrate Russia into the western power structures. Next is something so important that I will single it out on a separate parapgraph:

The Atlantic Integrationists are still in full control of the Russian financial and banking sector, of all the key economic ministries and government positions, they control the Russian Central Bank and they are, by far, the single biggest threat to the rule of Putin and those supporting him. Considering that roughly 90% of Russians now support Putin, that means that these Atlantic Integrationists are the single biggest threat to the Russian people and Russia as a whole.

How is that all linked to Israel? Simple!

Putin inherited a system created by and for the AngloZionist Empire. He was a compromise candidate between two radically opposed parties and it took him years to first get rid of most of the the Russian (Jewish) oligarchs and then, very gradually, begin cleanup process in which slowly, step by step, the Zionists were booted out of their positions of power. According to Mikhail Khazin, the balance between these two groups has only recently reached a 50/50 point of (unstable) equilibrium. That also means that the “Putin people” need to watch their back every day the Good Lord makes because they know that their so-called “colleagues” are willing to stab them in a blink of an eye as soon as they get an opportunity.

I happen to think that the rumors of a coup in Russia are greatly exaggerated. Not only because Putin does the support of the “power ministries” (Defense, State Security, Internal Affairs, etc.) but, much more importantly, because of the 90% support he has with the Russian people. To overthrow a man with such a cult-like following, a man truly loved by the vast majority of people, would be too dangerous. But that does not mean that the 5th column is not willing to sabotage every effort of Putin and his supporters.

The truth is that Putin has been forced to compromise many, many times. Here are just a few examples:

The oligarchs: when Putin ridded Russia of the semibankirshchina he did not really crack down on all the oligarchs as such. He only only got rid of those oligarchs who, like Khodorkovsky, had tried to basically stage a coup against Putin by buying the entire Duma. The oligarchs were told “stay out of politics and I will leave you alone”. The deal is still on today.

The economy: even in his last speech Putin had to declare that he fully supports the Central Bank and the economic Ministers of the Medvedev government. Considering that literally ALL Putin allies openly and vocally are screaming bloody murder about the way the Russian economy is mismanaged, this is clearly a coerced statement and not something he believes in. By the way, I am observing a systematic vilification campaign on the central Russian TV channels against the Central Bank and the economic Ministers and this cannot be a coincidence. I predict that Putin is preparing a purge of these circles, but that he needs to line up all his ducks in a row before taking action, especially by inflaming the public opinion against them. Right now the Russian economy is still run by IMF-stooges, by “Washington consensus” types, hence their crazy policy on interest rates, on buying US obligations, on keeping inflation low, etc. etc. etc. Putin, by conviction, is not what I would call a “socialist” but he is most definitely a proponent of “social markets” and somebody who is trying hard to decouple Russia from the western financial system, and not play by the rules of the Empire.

Foreign policy: right up until Putin’s latest re-election when finally Russia began to have a fairly consistent foreign policy, the policy of Russia has been one of zigs followed by zags. This was especially true during the times when Medvedev was in charge of the Presidency and when Iran and Libya were betrayed by Russia at the UNSC (something Putin openly called “stupid”).
Personalities: remember the hyper-corrupt Minister of Defense Serdiukov? Guess what? He has still not been formally charged with anything. Even the woman he did most of his dirty dealing with still lives in her luxurious apparent in Moscow. What does this tell us? That even when Putin got the hard proof of Serdiukov’s malfeasance he had enough power to replace him by Shoigu, but not enough to power to stick such high-profile “Atlantic Integrationists” into jail.

Nazi occupied Ukraine: Putin had enough control over the government to provide the vital Voentorg and to even send some special forces and artillery strikes across the border to help the Novorussians, but he could not force the economic Ministries to use the Russian economic might to strangle the Ukrainian economy. This resulted in Russia sending artillery shells across the border in Saur Mogila and (basically free) energy across the border to Kiev.

Russophobic propaganda: when recently some third-rate sport journalist, Alexei Andronov, posted a viciously anti-Russian comment in Twitter he was criticized for that by Alexei Pushkov, a journalist who is also the head of the foreign-affairs committee in the State Duma on his own TV show “Postscriptum”. The TV channel which airs the show, TV Tsentr, the censored the segment criticizing Andronov. Then, the famous Russian movie director Nikita Mikhailkov recoded an entire show discussing this event, the TV channel running his show, TV Rossia, also censored the entire episode. As for the director of the TV channel where Andronov works, Tina Kandelaki, she gave Andronov her full support. Bottom line: while Putin did immensely improve the overall quality of the Russian media, the russophobes are still very influential and can spew their hateful venom in total impunity.

I could continue to list example after example, but I think you get the idea: Putin is a very good man in charge of a very bad system.

Now let’s really get back to Syria, Hezbollah and the murder of Samir Kuntar.

First, consider that the decision to militarily intervene in the Syrian war was already a controversial one. Putin pulled this one off by doing two things: explaining to the Russian people that it was better to deal with the terrorists “there” (in Syria) rather than “here” (in Russia) and by promising that he would not send in ground forces. When Daesh and the Turks fulfilled the promise made by Obama and Biden and blew a Russian airliner and, later, a SU-24 bomber out of the sky, the Russian public continued to support Putin, but most Russians, including myself, were acutely aware of the dangers of the situation. At the end of the day, it is Putin’s personal “street cred” which allowed him to stay the course in spite of real fears.

Second, it is clear that Putin and Netanyahu struck a deal when the latter traveled to Moscow: the Israelis don’t interfere in Russian operations in support of the Syrians as long as the Russians don’t interfere in the combat operations between Israel and Hezbollah. This made it possible for both sides to pursue their main interest even if it was at the cost of their secondary objectives. You don’t like that deal and you question its morality? Good! So do I. I am, in fact, intensely uncomfortable with it, but I expect no less from ruthless realpolitik practitioners like Putin and Bibi Netanyahu (good thing you and I are not in power!).

There is, by the way, another precedent which I am just as uncomfortable with: the Russian total backing for the Egyptian military’s bloody repression against the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. I accept the argument that to support the Egyptian military made sense in the context of the war in Syria, but the ethnics of supporting such a regime intensely bother me. This is why Putin is a ruthless but successful politician and I am a little quasi-irrelevant blogger: it takes a ruthless bear to fight ruthless wolves.

This being said, let’s not pretend like Hezbollah is any less cynical when needed. I remind you all that when Imad Mugniyeh was murdered in Damascus by the very same Israelis in an operation which could only have been executed with very high level accomplices in the Assad regime, Hezbollah promised “retaliation” but never peeped a single word against the regime. Neither did Hezbollah have any objections when Assad was torturing Muslims on behalf of the US CIA for the infamous “rendition” program.

As for Putin, he simply has other priorities than to protect Hezbollah or fight Israel:

Surviving inside Russia and not being overthrown by the still very powerful Zionist Power Configuration (to use James Petras’ expression) in Russia being a top one. Another priority would be not to give his (internal and external) enemies the political argument that “Russia is attacking Israel”. Not having a shooting match with Israel and not to have the small and isolated Russian contingent have to fight on two fronts would be crucial too. Ditto not to be accused of having the Russians contingent turned into the de-facto “Hezbollah Air Force” like the US is the “Daesh Air Force”. These are all obvious priorities for Putin.

And then this: while the Russian S-400s can easily shoot down any Israeli aircraft, the Russian AirSpace contingent does not have the materials means to fight Israel or, even less so, NATO and CENTCOM. As for Russia, she most definitely cannot pick a fight with Israel not due to the inherent power of this tiny Zionist Entity, but due to the fact that the US Empire has been thoroughly taken under Zionist control. So those Americans who now complain that Putin “does not have the courage” to take on Israel should first ask themselves how it is that Israel seems to have transformed the USA and Europe in a voiceless Zionist protectorate and what they are doing to liberate themselves from that yoke!

Speaking of the West: one ought to compare the position of the AngloZionist Empire one one hand, and of many influential Russian Jews (in Russia and in Israel) about the war in the Ukraine. While the West has been in total support of the Nazi regime in Kiev, many Russian Jews, especially the very famous ones like Vladimir Soloviev, have taken a categorically anti-Nazi position. And while in Israel the popularity of Putin and Russia is still extremely low, most of the anti-Putin opposition in Russia is not formed of Jews. Finally, the Russian general public is, sadly, extremely poorly informed of the horrors perpetrated by the Zionist regime against the Palestinian people while Israelis and dual-nationals (like Evgenii Satanovskii or Avigdor Eskin) are constantly peddling the notion that “we Russians and Israelis are the only ones standing up to Muslim terrorism” thereby capitalizing to the max by the current war between Russia and Daesh. In other words, Putin would have one hell of a tough time selling the shooting down of an Israeli aircraft to the Russian general public.

I understand that none of the above will have any traction with bona fide Jew-haters or with those who like simple, black and white, arguments. For them Putin will forever remain a sellout, an eternal shabbos-goy or a puppet of the international financiers. Frankly, I am not addressing this to them. But there are those who are sincerely bewildered and confused about Russian policies which do appear to be confusing or even contradictory. To them I will conclude by saying this:

Putin advances his cause one step a a time and he knows how to wait and let events take on their own dynamic. He is also acutely aware that he is literally fighting with one hand tied behind his back and the other one busy defending against external and internal enemies (the latter being far more dangerous) at the same time. I am sure that Putin fully realizes that,at least potentially, his policy of resistance, sovereignization and liberation can lead to an intercontinental nuclear war and that Russia is currently still weaker than the AngloZionist Empire. Just as in the times of Stolypin, Russia desperately needs a few more years of peace to develop herself and fully stand up. This is most definitely not the time for a frontal confrontation with the Empire. Russia vitally needs *peace* and *time*: peace in the Ukraine, peace in Europe and, yes, peace in the Middle-East. Alas, the latter is not an option and, when cornered, Putin did take the decision to go to war. And I am absolutely and categorically certain that if the Empire attacks Russia (from Turkey or elsewhere), Russia will fight back. Russia is willing to go to war if needed, but she will do her utmost to avoid it. This is the price Russia pays for being the weaker side. The good news is that Russia is getting stronger with every passing day, while the Empire is getting weaker. And the power of the AngloZionists and their 5th column in Russia is also weakening with every passing day. But this process will take time.

The big event to watch for is a crackdown on the Central Bank and the economy ministries of the government. Everybody in Russia is waiting for this, Putin even got directly asked this question recently, but he is sill denying it all and saying that he fully supports these saboteurs. Considering Putin’s track, it is plain stupid to say that he really supports them – this is clearly a delaying tactic until the time is right.

Make no mistake. There is no big love between Russia and Israel. But neither is there a lot of hostility, at least not on the Russian side. Most Russian are aware of the ugly role Jews played already twice in Russian history, but this does not translate into the kind of hostility towards Jews which you would see, for example, in the Ukraine. And while most Russians would not want to have a return to power of a new version of the Bolshevik commissars or the “democratic” oligarchs inside Russia, there is a closeness and an anti-Nazi solidarity between Russians and Israelis which should not be dismissed.

Concerning Palestine, Russia will support all the relevant UN Resolutions and thus be the typical and rather unimaginative “two state solution” proponent. At most, Russia will “deplore” or “regret” the abuses of Palestinians by Israelis, but Russia will never become a systematic defender of Palestinian rights like Iran or Hezbollah simply because the future of Palestine is not a Russian priority.

I hope that the above is helpful in understanding why Russia does not take any action to protect Hezbollah against the Israelis (and why she will not prevent Hezbollah from retaliating from Syria, should Hezbollah take that decision). Simply put: there is no compelling internal or external reason for Russia to get directly involved in this while there are plenty of compelling internal and external reasons for Russia to stay out. If in the past the USSR supported the PLO on both ideological and geostrategic reasons, modern Russia today will not follow the same paradigm. Besides, it’s not like Fatah or Hamas are attractive, or even credible, partners for Russia, being in bed as they are with Daesh. Ditto for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

As for Hezbollah, it is not like they need Russia’s protection. Symbolic as they may be, the murders of Imad Mugniyeh or Samir Kuntar will in no way weaken the Resistance. In fact, if the history of the murder of Abbas al-Musawi teaches us anything, it is that sometimes Israelis murder a Hezbollah leader only to find out that the next one is even a more formidable adversary. God willing, this will also be the case this time.

(Article photo by David Dees)

The post Putin & “Israel”: A Complex & Multi-layered Relationship appeared first on Insight Media.